|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I used Surface-to-Surface option for radiation modelling for an air domain in CFX-V11. The solver output file shows that the target coarsening rate is the same number as the number of elements in the air domain and therefore 'number of radiation elements = 1'. The air domain seems to be replaced by one (volume?) element. What happens with the domain boundary surfaces here. Are these surface elements still refined (i.e. discretised) as for the other (e.g. hydrodynamic) equations? Any help is very appreciated TobiasZ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
OK, I have found an answer from 'opaque' in another thread. Anyway, thanks.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
surface to surface radiation in FLUENT | manikrishchinna | FLUENT | 1 | March 8, 2010 05:14 |
surface to s. radiation in air above transp. fluid | dace | CFX | 1 | March 3, 2009 07:35 |
modelling a free surface with the FVM | Philip Simons | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 1, 2006 13:26 |
combined convection and surface radiation modeling | kali | CFX | 0 | January 30, 2006 09:33 |
Free surface modelling under CFX 4 | Dahong | CFX | 2 | June 22, 2002 23:07 |