CFX vs Flow-3D Benchmark

feizaghaee · June 2, 2010, 09:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghorrocks

Your question states the answer - if you need RSM models then you need a solver which supports RSM models and that counts Flow3D out and leaves you with CFX.

what do you think of Fluent?
is it more powerful than CFX in Reynolds stress modeling?

ghorrocks · June 2, 2010, 18:34

Sweeping generalisations like what you ask are pointless. Both CFX and Fluent are strong on RSM modelling and can both do it. Try them both and choose the one best for you.

feizaghaee · June 3, 2010, 04:46

i meant that maybe you have some experiences like about Flow-3D and CFX.
thanks a lot any away.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Flow meter Design	CD adapco Group Marketing	Siemens	3	June 21, 2011 08:33
Urgent: How to model a stationary sphere in a pressure driven flow using Ansys CFX?	farhan	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	1	April 14, 2009 14:34
CFX mass flow boundary condition	Michele Cagna	CFX	3	February 22, 2007 15:52
Calculation of ratational flow in CFX	Yves	CFX	1	January 27, 2004 16:48
fluid flow fundas	ram	Main CFD Forum	5	June 17, 2000 21:31

June 2, 2010, 18:34		#22
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,700 Rep Power: 143	Sweeping generalisations like what you ask are pointless. Both CFX and Fluent are strong on RSM modelling and can both do it. Try them both and choose the one best for you.

June 3, 2010, 04:46		#23
feizaghaee Senior Member moein Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 132 Rep Power: 16	i meant that maybe you have some experiences like about Flow-3D and CFX. thanks a lot any away.