# sawdust generation

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 10, 2009, 08:26 sawdust generation #1 New Member   Dane Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 9 Hi guys, I'm an undergraduate fairly new to the cfd world but am currently undergoing a cfd research project in my final year after enjoying and doing well in an introductory cfd course last semester. the project involves using lagrangian particle tracking to model the dispersion of dust in a workshop from the sanding of wood during wood turning on a lathe. then find a solution to reduce the dust spread as it can cause health problems. I know it's possible to set the wood on the lathe up as a rotating boundary etc. and I have done both the axial turbine and multiphasemixer tutorials. but what would be the best way to model the production of dust in cfx from my rotating boundary? also is it possible to enter a distribution of particulate sizes produced from the sanding as I had this information? Thankyou!

 August 10, 2009, 10:41 #2 Senior Member   Joshua Counsil Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Posts: 366 Rep Power: 10 Hi Dane - The Blunt Body tutorial uses particles of varying size flowing over a body. J

 August 10, 2009, 20:27 #3 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,304 Rep Power: 103 Hi, Your first decision is whether to go lagrangian particle tracking or if a eularian approach will work. Firstly consider the simplest approach. If the sawdust is small enough that it has no significant relative slip compared to the velocity field (that is the dust is small enough and light enough to follow the velocity field) then forget particle tracking and use a passive scalar. In CFX talk this is an additional variable. If this assumption is good then this will be much faster and more accurate. If the particles are big enough that there is some relative slip then a eularian approach may still be valid. You just need to define a drag equation which is appropriate. You should only really go lagrangian particle tracking if you need a history for the particles. Sounds like you don't care about this so a eularian approach sounds more appropriate. So at first glance I would recommend you look at eularian approaches rather than lagrangian approaches. As for the sander creating the dust: If you only care about the flow in the room then don't bother modelling the details of the sander. Just put an inlet or a source term where the dust is created, squirting air and dust in the direction and velocity of the exhaust from the sander. No need for rotating boundaries or multiple frames of reference. And yes, you can do particle size distributions in both eularian and lagrangian approaches. Glenn Horrocks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post krishnachandranr Main CFD Forum 0 July 28, 2009 04:22 Marcus Lobbia Main CFD Forum 2 November 9, 2003 06:53 Robert Schneiders Main CFD Forum 1 February 18, 2000 01:48 Robert Schneiders Main CFD Forum 0 February 16, 2000 08:12 Robert Schneiders Main CFD Forum 0 March 2, 1999 05:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top