|
[Sponsors] |
Which software is better for channel flow with sedimentation effects. CFX or Fluent? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
mechovator
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Dear users of CFX, I have a very simple question and need answer with reasons. "Which software is better for 3D channel flow with sedimentation effects. CFX or Fluent?". Kindly do reply with reasons.
Waiting for your reply. With best regards. Mechovator |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,933
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am pretty sure CFX does not have a sedimentation model and I don't think Fluent has one either - but you should check this. I know Flow3D has a sedimentation model. I have no idea how good it is.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
channel flow, sedimentation |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 04:13 |
CFX mass flow boundary condition | Michele Cagna | CFX | 3 | February 22, 2007 15:52 |
CFX compared to FLUENT | newbie | CFX | 1 | August 1, 2005 18:29 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 21:31 |
Seeking for flow field (vector plot) visualization software. | Hua | Main CFD Forum | 7 | January 25, 1999 11:33 |