CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

FloEFD CFDesign or CFX

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 29, 2009, 09:12
Default FloEFD CFDesign or CFX
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Bigga is on a distinguished road
My Company is buying a new CFD Software package for both fluid flow and heat transfer aplications.

We have decided on 3 options - FloEFD, CFDesign and CFX. User friendliness is very important for us - we need something that caters to the engineer and not the CFD PhD since our bussiness environment is very fast moving. If we have ideas we need to check them quickly and move on, and we do not want to get to the more complicated level of Fluent, it is simply not necessary.

However we are having trouble defining the strong points and week points of one program against the other.

can any one help?
Bigga is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2009, 00:39
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 10
sans is on a distinguished road
The best way forward is to benchmark the 3 softwares; the software firms would be happy to do it.
Recently we had evaluated CFDesign vs our current CFX. It did predict the numbers pretty well vs experimental results, ease of use was a highlight. But we needed more such as multiphase, turbo post processing etc which CFdesign didnt offer.
It depends on your needs and the complexity of your problems. All the best!!
sans is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2009, 09:35
Default strong/weak points, depends on user & applications
New Member
Tom Hagerty
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Tom Hagerty is on a distinguished road
Great question, Bigga. I'd suggest the hands on comparison, or at the very least a demonstration of your model by each company. Websites and demos always look great, but the application at hand coupled with the target users will point out the best tool.

The CFD market has changed a lot in the past 5 years. From a technical aspect, there used to be 2 extremes - tools like Fluent/Comsol on the specialist side, embedded tools like FlowWorks/EFD on the simple side. That's all evolving - simple tools can do more than ever before, but like sans said there are clear distinctions in capability/cost/ease of use, etc.

More importantly the companies behind the tools are all evolving as well - Ansys bought Fluent, Mentor Graphics bought Flomerics who bought Nika...who authors FlowSimulation & EFD.

All the more reason to put the tools to work. Will show you the differences in each tool's strenght/weakness, and what it's like to be a customer and collaborate with each code's support team.
Tom Hagerty is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2009, 20:45
Senior Member
ckleanth's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 257
Rep Power: 11
ckleanth is on a distinguished road
If there is nobody in your company that can assess the said CFD sofware I would suggest that you first contract somone with CFD experience to assess the task that you want to simulate and the level of detail you require. why contract someone you might say? well if you have no experience with CFD and you are given results from the said demonstration simulations the results and the way they go about to obtain these results will most likey be just pretty pictures and mumbo jumbo.

IMO you need to ask the right questions to the developers regarding their CFD software/meshing applications and post prossesing tools and dont forget customer/technical support for the foreseeing future
Top 4 tips
1. Knowledge is everything and Ignorance is dangerous.
2. Understand your limitations and try to eliminate them.
3. Get yerself a bike and hoon the chuffer. You will soon learn why dogs like to hang their heads out the car window.
4. Please before asking any questions on how to run simulations in CFX, go though all the tutorials
ckleanth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 4, 2010, 07:41
New Member
Matt Milne
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
matt_milne is on a distinguished road
Hi Bigga,

I work for Mentor Graphics and specifically I am an application engineer for FloEFD.

Which CFD code is best for you depends to some extent on your application as they all have different strengths and weaknesses. Contrary to an earlier suggestion, the best person to benchmark different CFD software is actually you, the user, because no one else knows your application and the results you expect to see better than you do.

As well as guaranteeing impartiality, doing an evaluation yourself is also a very good way of finding out if the software is really as easy to use as the vendor claims. True, there is a risk of new-user-error if you do this, but that is why I always work closely with my prospects during an evaluation to make sure they get the best use out of the software and don't get poor results just because of some trivial user error.

You have listed a number of requirements and to be honest you've really answered your own question already - even being completely objective I have to say your requirements all point strongly towards FloEFD so I recommend you contact your local Mentor Graphics office for an evaluation if you haven't already done so (or PM me and I can put you in touch).

Best Regards,

matt_milne is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL Val Main CFD Forum 3 June 10, 2011 02:20
CFX or CFDesign Ed Chavez Main CFD Forum 8 October 18, 2007 04:26
PhD using CFX Rui CFX 9 May 28, 2007 05:59
CFDesign > CFX or ICEM CFD Endlos CFX 0 June 14, 2005 02:55
CFX 4.4 installation problem Pandu Sattvika CFX 1 December 1, 2001 05:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11.