# effective size of flow boundary for aerofoil analysis

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 9, 2010, 15:20 effective size of flow boundary for aerofoil analysis #1 New Member   sarah Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 3 Rep Power: 10 hey does anyone know what the recommended size of a flow boundary is for aerofoil analysis - I heard it was something like 5 times the size of the length of the aerofoil-any ideas (preferably with a reference)

 January 14, 2010, 17:35 #2 Senior Member   Reza Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Appleton, WI Posts: 116 Rep Power: 10 Hi, I've seen it being taken as small as two times (for a hydrofoil, Re~10^7) up to ~10 times (for an external flow around a car, Re~10^8). I don't remember the references right now, but if it is very important I can dig them up. In my opinion, you should take the extension as much as you can, and the node capacity allows you to. Software usually takes the first or second derivative of the velocity as zero on the downstream boundaries, so the farther the better. Also as you don't, usually, need a lot of resolution very far from the object, you can use larger elements and make the additional computational load as small as possible. I hope this helps.

 January 16, 2010, 14:56 #3 New Member   Corrado Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 15 Rep Power: 10 Nangless to have good convergence try to work ,at least, with these dimensions: - 20c downstream (c is the chord of the airfoil) - 10 c upstream - 5c upper and lower Coarse mesh near the exterior boundaries Fine mesh around airfoil and some chords downstream for the wake For references have a look to Aiaa, Agard, Sae papers/documents I hope this helps Cpinz

 January 16, 2010, 17:12 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,877 Rep Power: 107 The size will depend on what you are trying to do. The further out you go the more accurate it will be. So a simulation where 10% error is acceptable will be much smaller than one where 0.1% error is required. I know people don't like my answers on questions like this because I ask them to establish for themselves, but it is the only way to be sure. You have to do a sensitivity check of the parameter.

 Tags flow boundary

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Atit CFX 1 August 2, 2015 13:42 Blasius_Pohlhausen_Crocco Main CFD Forum 12 September 30, 2013 17:35 Paul Bateman FLUENT 2 January 10, 2013 14:01 mactech001 CFX 6 November 15, 2009 22:25 Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top