CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

SST and K-omega worst than laminar, why?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 19, 2010, 04:02
Default SST and K-omega worst than laminar, why?
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
Jervds is on a distinguished road

I'm simulating a cavity heated on the bottom and filled of water in transient state (free convection, low Ra number apparently). I'm trying to validate my case with a PIV system.
I used an sst and k-omega models (I used the same mesh with yplus<1) but my results with this two models are not so good. After, I tried without turbulent models (laminar with the same mesh) and the results are quite good.
Some one can explain me why, because even if my case is laminar, the turbulent models must to give me the same results or close, no? I’m asking this, because for the duration that I study maybe I’ll pass to the transient turbulent zone, and which model I’ll use?


Last edited by Jervds; April 19, 2010 at 04:22.
Jervds is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2010, 06:39
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 13,805
Rep Power: 107
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
You are not alone:

In my PhD thesis, written almost a decade ago (wow! time flies) I found that for internal combustion engine modelling, using no turbulence model in an LES type setup proved to be just as accurate, and in some respects more accurate than traditional turbulence models.

If the flow is low Re/Ra number then the turbulence is not strong and you may well be better off using a laminar flow model. Generally this is because of the simplifications (ie some cross terms get ignored in turbulent flow models but are included in laminar) and additional dissipation of the turbulence model (which is what turbulence models do). Looks like you have found another example.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote


k-omega, laminar, sst

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
k Omega SST SAS for OpenFOAM 1.5??? barath.ezhilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 June 2, 2010 07:41
Use of k omega turbulence model john_w OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 September 22, 2009 05:15
Wall function implementation K Omega SSt cbarry OpenFOAM 3 August 18, 2009 10:09
Implementation details of SST k-omega model Niels Main CFD Forum 3 July 3, 2008 17:45
Swirling flow in a diffuser: K-E over SST ? Felix CFX 3 February 27, 2007 22:03

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14.