|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Roughness has no influence on results, k-epsilon |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Robert Safar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I try to modelling flow over a small dam (embankment). The rougness of dam surface is about d90=20mm (grain size). I tried to model smooth wall and rougnesses hs= 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mm.
In this case i have these problems: 1. different results between smooth wall and rough wall hs=0mm 2. For rougneses hs higher than 20 mm is no influence on results (water level - head is constant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Robert Safar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
1. There was a problem with mesh thickness.
2. Ok it's my fault. I didnt know that the first cell of mesh must be twice higher than rougness. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | March 4, 2017 09:30 |
| Gravity (g) Influence on Simulation Results | Colin | FLUENT | 12 | September 23, 2015 10:45 |
| SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 21:21 |
| why k epsilon gives underpridctred results? | michael | CFX | 1 | January 29, 2007 10:06 |
| Gravity g's influence on Simulation Results | Colin | Main CFD Forum | 6 | November 2, 2003 15:13 |