|
[Sponsors] |
September 29, 2010, 09:06 |
How many geometry domains?
|
#1 |
New Member
David
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15 |
I'm wondering what is good practice for relatively complex geometries. If the direction and velocity of flow is very different throughout the geometry, should I split it into a bunch of domains with interfaces so that I can set their initializations seperately? Or should I be keeping it as simple as possible?
Particularly with slow multiphase flows, CFX seemed to have a lot of difficulty producing convincing results if I didn't split it up and set initializations for velocity, direction, and mass or volume fraction seperately. |
|
September 29, 2010, 18:53 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
You don't need to split and join with interfaces just to set initial conditions. Initial conditions can be set on sub-domains, interpolation functions or CEL expressions. The simulation will partition better if it is one domain with no interfaces.
Obviously you need to set realistic initial conditions. This is standard CFD practice. |
|
September 30, 2010, 08:50 |
|
#3 |
New Member
David
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15 |
I will try subdomains again. I think I tried to use them before but I couldn't get them working.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] O-grid around wing geometry | Anorky | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 15 | November 27, 2017 13:43 |
[Gmsh] Problem meshing an imported geometry | Alicia | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | March 30, 2010 04:53 |
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry | EmersonKB | CFX | 5 | July 2, 2009 08:17 |
Creating a flow geometry with domains with different porosity | arkasshka | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 15 | December 7, 2007 02:11 |
vitual _ real | deneb | FLUENT | 3 | January 22, 2007 04:31 |