CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Quadratic Resistance Coefficient when energy source added.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 26, 2010, 10:02
Post Quadratic Resistance Coefficient when energy source added.
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
JoFFe is on a distinguished road
Sponsored Links
Hi all.
I am modeling a porous domain with an energy source added to it. Compressible helium is flowing through this porous domain.

I can analytically calculate the linear and quadratic resistance coefficients for when energy is not added. In that case it works just fine and the pressure drop is coherent with my analytic calculation. It also works if I use incompressible helium and heat is added.

As soon as i use helium as ideal gas and heat is added, my equations for the resistance coefficients don't work any more. Does anybody know how to calculate resistance coefficients when an energy source(heat) is added to the porous domain?

Would really appreciate some help! Thanks
JoFFe is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old   October 26, 2010, 11:17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 532
Rep Power: 14
stumpy is on a distinguished road
Apply the loss using the permeability and loss coefficient instead, since the loss coefficient is multipled by density so will the momentum loss will automatically adjust as the density changes. The quadratic resistance is related to the loss coefficient as:

Quadratic Resistance Coeff = Loss Coeff * (Density/2)

So if you've calculated your quadratic loss for a given density, you can back out the Loss Coeff.
stumpy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2010, 13:25
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
JoFFe is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the tip, I will try that soon. But do you mean that i should add that as an expresseion or calculate a value and enter that in the filed for loss coefficient?

By the way: I have been using expressions as resistance coefficients before with the density included, but for some reson the pressure drop goes against the same value as I set as inlet pressure. Do you se any problem with using these boundary conditions?

Inlet: Total pressure: 20 bar
Outlet: Mass flov: 0.78294 kg/s
Reference pressure: 0 atm

I'm using this because the maximum allowed pressure in the system is 20 bar. Any suggestions or ideas if this is okey or if there is a better way?

Last edited by JoFFe; October 26, 2010 at 14:36.
JoFFe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 08:42
Senior Member
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 10
bharath is on a distinguished road
i think the solution you obtain is right.porous domain is an imaginary thing, inside the real condition also it will happen like that only or if you want force the drop you can adjust the coefficient little on either side, give you the exact thing you need.

stumpy says the same thing
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote


energy, linear, porous, quadratic, resistance

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simulation of a Silo Attesz CFX 20 October 15, 2010 08:11
Version 15 on Mac OS X gschaider OpenFOAM Installation 120 December 2, 2009 11:23
Compiling gmshFoam with OpenFOAM-1.5 BlGene Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 10 August 6, 2009 04:26
Why FVM for high-Re flows? Zhong Lei Main CFD Forum 23 May 14, 1999 13:22
linearization of radiative energy source term Nuray Kayakol Main CFD Forum 0 May 7, 1999 08:11

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12.