|November 4, 2010, 18:07||
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3Rep Power: 8
I'm trying to model two rotating discs with some radial plates between them, with axial flow.
The picture shown here:
Inlet mass flow is used in the bottom, outlet pressure in the end and rotational periodic in each side. All the walls are rotating around the x axis.
I have no problem with modeling just two rotating discs but when I add the radial plate to the geometry, I get this error at the the first step of solver.
| ERROR #002100080 has occurred in subroutine CHECK_NORMV.
| The specified velocity vector on the boundary patch
| Default Domain Default
| has a significant normal component at one or more faces. One of
| these face locations is
| (x,y,z) = ( 4.43340E-03, 3.68905E-02, 5.00000E-04).
| The angle between the specified velocity and the element surface is
| 89.217 degrees at this face. This is considered an error because
| it implies that the mesh is moving. The following are possible
| reasons for the error message:
| 1. There is a setup error; for example, an incorrect axis of
| 2. There may be a meshing problem; for example, the nodes on a
| rotating surface might not lie on the surface of revolution.
3. The boundary is curved and the mesh is very coarse. In this
| case, you may increase the tolerance for this check by
| increasing the expert parameter 'tangential vector tolerance'
| from its default of 20 degrees.
The location (x,y,z) refers to the a point at the end of the plate.
P.S. I refined the mesh in that spot but it didn't work.
Last edited by farrr; November 4, 2010 at 18:30.
|November 5, 2010, 11:47||
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 532Rep Power: 13
What's your rotation axis? I assume you need to use MFR for this. In a rotating domain, any counter-rotating walls must be tangential to the rotation direction. In a stationary domain, any rotating walls must be tangential to the specified velocity direction.
|November 5, 2010, 11:49||
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 196Rep Power: 10
You need to put the system in a rotating frame of reference and apply counter-rotating wall velocities to the fixed walls, instead of attempting to apply a rotating wall velocity to the rotating plate. The wall velocity has to be tangent to the wall, otherwise the system is not stationary.
|October 20, 2011, 02:48||
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5Rep Power: 7
toaday ,i use the rotating frame and counter-rotating wall to define the simulation,but the same problem is occour.i want to know what you did in your work.
|July 20, 2015, 14:24||
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 59Rep Power: 6
counter rotating wall's mesh is coarse hence surface normal are >25 (cfx default). Refining could be an option or removing 3D features
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Rotating Impeller||Naith||FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM||22||November 5, 2012 09:53|
|vibration of a rotating plate in water||zhm||Main CFD Forum||0||March 2, 2010 19:50|
|heat transfer on dimpled plate||mech||FLUENT||4||February 6, 2007 16:15|
|Parallel Plate Rheometer vs Cone & Plate||beginner||Main CFD Forum||0||March 19, 2003 12:49|
|jet on rotating plate||A.TOUZANI||Main CFD Forum||0||January 30, 2003 11:05|