|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
if my rotating domain's rpm is more than 100k rpm means why recommended to solve with 2 or 3 low rpms (ex: 10k, 30k & 70k rpm) and then to solve 100k rpm?
what's is the physics or logic beyond this? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
The fluid flow will likely be simpler at lower RPM. If the solution diverges at 10k RPM, then it definitely won't converge at 100k RPM. This allows you to analyze individual components (e.g., mesh, timestepping scheme, boundary conditions) with a simpler problem rather than diving right into the complex problem without verifying your model works.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem Importing Geometry ProE to CFX | fatb0y | CFX | 3 | January 14, 2012 20:42 |
Initialisation problem Turbo tool CFX-Post | Toralf | CFX | 0 | February 13, 2008 06:44 |
grid generator for turbo machinery. | Stelios | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 20, 2007 04:05 |
natural convection problem for a CHT problem | Se-Hee | CFX | 2 | June 10, 2007 07:29 |
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) | ParodDav | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2007 20:13 |