|
[Sponsors] |
March 4, 2020, 03:04 |
making a decision about BC
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello
my question is about BC dilemma. I have a ducted fan. it has his rpms and perfomance curve obtained through massflow throttling. so now i`ve tried to simulate such task - i want to put this fan onto a big domain like its hanging in the air. So the fan is going to have only it`s rpms and atmospheric pressure of the air. Does somebody have any idea which BCs I need to use for this big domain? I`ve tried to use Opening for all the faces of domain but I`ve reached something really strange. |
|
March 4, 2020, 03:26 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 |
so the main question is - can I somehow tell the solver that this big domain is atmosphere?
or I need to determine all the pressures from each side of domain manually by myself? |
|
March 4, 2020, 18:07 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
If the fan has its entrance and exit inside the domain then use a source term. If the fan makes air enter or leave the domain then use an inlet or an outlet. Then set the source term, inlet or outlet up to have the pressure difference follow the mass flow rate curve from the performance curve.
Your second post is puzzling. If you do not model gravity then model atmosphere by an opening with pressure =0. If you are modelling gravity then make sure you have your reference pressures and density set correctly and you can still use an opening with pressure =0.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
March 5, 2020, 01:26 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Thank you for your reply! I do not model gravity. I`ve used Opening Pressure 0 with Entrainment option for all faces of the atmospheric domain and achieved some bad results. Maybe my opening option is not so good |
||
March 5, 2020, 01:38 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143 |
Try a pressure opening without the entrainment option.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
March 8, 2020, 21:27 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Basivi Reddy
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Tainan, Taiwan
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 9 |
I might help, but I did not understand your question properly. Please check the attachment.
Note: I used opening boundary condition at the outlet also. |
|
March 10, 2020, 03:40 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM.com] swak4foam compiling issues on a cluster | saj216 | OpenFOAM Installation | 5 | January 17, 2023 16:05 |
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow | NiFl | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 14 | November 25, 2020 03:30 |
[Other] How to use finite area method in official OpenFOAM 2.2.0? | Detian Liu | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | November 3, 2015 03:04 |
[foam-extend.org] problem when installing foam-extend-1.6 | Thomas pan | OpenFOAM Installation | 7 | September 9, 2015 21:53 |
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI | jens_klostermann | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | June 28, 2007 17:51 |