CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

6-dof rigid body solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 11, 2011, 02:33
Arrow 6-dof rigid body solver
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
AUN is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I am working on a HAWT Project. The geometry of the blade is available, however, the power curves have to be generated given different input wind speeds and directions.

For this purpose, I am applying the 6-DOF Rigid Body Solver in CFX.

At first I modelled the fluid domain as a cuboid with the blades subtracted from it. Not only did the 6-DOF take insanely long (Mesh 2.2 million) however, after a rotation of three degrees, the solver crashed due to volume negativity. I had kept mesh skewness low, and the mesh was fine in proximity of the blade. The raeson why this problem is occuring is unclear to me.

To counter this effect, I 'tried' doing the same as they have done in the Tutorial 'Decoupling Mesh Motion'. I created a subdomain in the fluid domain, a cylinder, ascribed to it the same motion as the Rigid Body and ignoring rotations at the outer domain inrerfaces. The mesh at the boundary of the subdomain was conformal. Mesh Size 1.9 million made in ICEM CFD. The same negative element volume problem persisted.

What can be done regarding this?



AUN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2011, 06:47
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 13,808
Rep Power: 107
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
I do not think you are using the correct approach. Forget 6DOF and FSI.

The way to do this is to put the blades in a rotating frame of reference and assume a rotation speed. Do a simulation and get the net torque. If the net torque is positive (ie blades would accelerate) then do another simulation a bit faster. Keep iterating until you get the rotation speed which produces a torque which matches the load on the turbine.

Once you have a few points on your speed versus torque curve you can use non-linear curve fits to greatly accelerate finding the converged value.

This way you replace an extemely long and difficult to converge transient run with a series of simple steady state runs. Much simpler.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2011, 22:59
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
AUN is on a distinguished road
Dear Glenn,

Thanks for your response.

Best Wishes
AUN is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
different results between serial solver and parallel solver wlt_1985 FLUENT 10 April 11, 2012 15:25
Working directory via command line Luiz CFX 4 March 6, 2011 21:02
Getting too many iterations by velocity solving (aborting). Changing U - Solver? suitup OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 20, 2010 08:45
Multi-Phase (VOF) & Rigid Body Motion in Star-CCM+ Star-CCM+ User Siemens 1 February 11, 2009 15:14
cannot run solver if body spacing less than 1 wan CFX 1 February 28, 2008 17:41

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:36.