Quote:
Outline>Output Control>Trn stats then define the start iteration list.(for example from iteration number 2500 or so). but if you don't do it in pre i suppose you have to do it with matlab. |
Quote:
I want to know how to use cfx cel and expression to get averaging in transient result ,can you help me! thank you very much |
Quote:
Also I haven't created transient statistics in cfx-pre. |
Quote:
Thanks in advance to any helpful reply you may provide! |
As far as I can see, there are 2 ways for time averaged results:
1) Create a Monitor point with time averaging (Max, Min, Avg, etc) - this will be saved to the *.res file for every time step and can be extracted via monitor in solver manager or cfx5mondata command. 2) Create a *.trn file every n iteration with the desired variables. In case you have saved some *.trn files, you can loop through them with a script and extract the desired data. The averaging has to be done manually in Matlab for example. Alternate way: create a plot in Post with the time on one axis. Caution: Hitting apply let's Post loop through all *.trn files, which might take long. If you don't have any *.trn files and have no monitor points set up accordingly, you only have the results of the last time step in your *.res file. |
when your run is finished you can extract the values for each time step (as long as you have the .trn files) by using a perl script as -Maxim- said, to import the values to e.g. excel and calculated there the time averages.
An example for a script file can be found under http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx...tml#post385850 |
Quote:
How can I do what you recommended in your answer, -Maxim-? In which stage do I create the monitor? In Pre setup, in the Solver or at the Post stage? How can I activate the cfx5mondata command and in which stage do I do that? How about this... I have the last .res files and some .trn but not all of them. If I run another simulation, just varying the Reynolds number of the flow, in transient regime, saving all .trn files and activating the .TrnAvg statistics in Pre, using as the entry values of the new run the last .res file created, that would provide a continuity to the simulation process with just a different reynolds number and, hence, provide more data. If I do all that, will the new .res only contain the info related to this new run or will it use the previous run extra-polating through it to use this data? All that to make sure I could get to that previous info. I don't know if the last paragraph makes sense to you... |
Monitorpoints are set in cfx-pre under output control and evaluated during the run. You can only see the results in the solver manager and from there they can be exported to a csv file.
If you start a new simulation...then why trying to "provide continuity"?...especially when you change basic flow settings. A new simulation run is a new simulation run and when you activate the transient statistics there, you will get them for this run. An extrapolation as you thought of would only be possible if you don't have any big changes in your solution during the simulation. I think it would then be better to use your results and few trn files to extract the required values with a perl script and calculate the statistics from there, even if the statisical basis is not fully given. |
1) create monitor points incl. averaging etc in Pre. You can set monitor points on expressions. Consult the manual or search this forum if you don't know how.
2) regarding cfx5mondata, the manual is explaining is pretty well. Or search this forum. Here I wrote some sample syntax: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx...tml#post603695 3) I don't think CFX interpolates/creates averaged variables if you continue with a new setup. I think the best way would be to set up a new run with all the monitor points etc, let it run for a few iterations until you get a couple of *.trn files and then stop to get the *.res file. Then test your scripts/monitor points. If result is good, do you long calculation. Good luck |
Quote:
what do you mean by the time averaged over passage or the whole machine? And where could I set up the averaged domain? It's a post long time ago, wish you could see my confusion |
You have not completely described your problem.
You have a total pressure distortion in front (as an inlet) of a turbomachinery component, correct? On which frame is the distortion, and on which frame is the component? If both are in the stationary frame, you should see the circumferential variation. However, if the distortion is moving relative to the component frame, you will only see the variation in one frame, but not in the other. |
Quote:
There are 3 domain in my simulation.First, it is a stationary domain which consists of inlet boundary condition,and steady total pressure distortion is in this domain.Second ,it is a rotating domain which has rotor, and I check the countor whether total pressure changes or not circumferentially. Third, it is stationary domain which has stator. domain which stator is in it. |
Are you looking at the contour on the stationary side of the sliding interface, or the rotating side?
Are you looking at the "Stationary Frame Total Pressure" or "Total Pressure" variable? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15. |