CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Turbulence Models

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 23, 2018, 02:49
Default Turbulence Models
  #1
Senior Member
 
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8
oliveira1820 is on a distinguished road
Hello to you all again

In my system I have a water cooling system with 0,2 l/s where the water receives the heat from the solids around, which gets to "turbulent" velocities. (Reynolds number).

And a container with heated water which evaporates and gets really fast and hot.

IŽm tryind to decide wich turbulence models should I use for each situatuion and I canŽt get any conclusion. Do you have any hint which one fits better each situation in particular?


Best regards and thanks!!
oliveira1820 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2018, 04:15
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11
urosgrivc is on a distinguished road
personaly I would use SST model for the firs case, beacouse you have heat transfer so you need acurate near wall modeling and because it combines omega and epsilon models with 2 blending functions. You can also complicate and add additional 2 equations for (transitional turbulence) intermitency and rethetat, so the flow can be laminar and turbulent (laminar usualy in the proximity of the wals)

For the second case I am not sure as i dont have experience with evaporation in cfx
urosgrivc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2018, 04:16
Default
  #3
siw
Senior Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 733
Rep Power: 25
siw will become famous soon enough
Shear Stress Transport (SST) with the default automatic wall treatment is a good place to start for RANS/URANS simulations. Only once you see the results can you judge if another model should be used instead or if you need to go with a RSM or scale-resolving method.
siw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2018, 04:25
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
SST is my working horse in these cases.
Make sure Y+ is around 1 where Prandtl is high (approx 7 at cooling side?).
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2018, 01:06
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8
oliveira1820 is on a distinguished road
I will use SST and see if I got convergence problems and if it doesnŽt corresponds to the experimetnal values IŽl try another.

Thank you very much guys!!!! Good work to you all
oliveira1820 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
different zones, different turbulence models gmwsy FLUENT 5 June 17, 2020 15:42
Adding turbulence models to (reacting)TwoPhaseEulerFoam lavdwall OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 3, 2017 03:04
y+ range for turbulence models babri FLUENT 1 August 30, 2016 17:39
Zero Equation Turbulence models stefan.gracik OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 April 17, 2013 14:12
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:30.