|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Dear friends
I am doing fluid flow through multilayer artery porous wall. The wall layers are in micrometer. I would like to define porosity and permeability of the layers The length of wall 120mm thickness of the wall layer is 0.5mm I have four layers thickness starts from 2micro meter, 10 micrometer, 2 micrometer, 400 micrometer and so on. Flow is in the Z direction. when r=0 , it is the axis of the tube. The fluid domain diameter 2.5 mm Please clarify my doubts 1. I defined porosity and permiabilty as function of radius . Is it correct? 2. I use one dimensional function as shown below radius (mm) ---------------------------- porosity 1.25001 ------------------------------- 0.005 1.25002 ----------------- --------------- 0.005 ............ .................. ................. 1.6001 --------------- ------------- 0.02 1.6002--------------- ---------- 0.02 .......... ........... and so on I check the the box extened min extended max Is the above correct? or should I remove the extended min / extended max? What is the porosity value at the interface at r=1.25mm? If I check the box extended min, it will be in the fluid domain. Please help me , How can I handle this? Regards Shashwat |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Have you considered the implications of what you are doing? You have layer thicknesses of 2, 10, 2, 400 microns. Why model the 2 and 10 micron layers? Do they add anything significant? If they are significant, then why not just model the 400 micron layer and combine all the 2 and 10 micron layers into a flow resistance at the inside of the 400 micron layer?
To get your model to model the 2 micron layer you are going to need an element of at most 2um, more like 1um to be sure just ensure you resolve the thin layer. That mean you need approximately 250 elements through the thickness. Do you have enough computing power to run a model with this many elements? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Dear friend
I am not going to use layer by layer. I use only the porosity as a function of radius is it possible in the 2micro meter and 10 micrometer thickness? Regards shashwat |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I do not understand your last comment.
Simply put, to resolve a 2um thick porous region you need a mesh smaller than 2um. That will probably lead to a massive mesh, or huge aspect ratio changes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Porous media setup issues in Fluent | Bernard Van | FLUENT | 29 | January 26, 2017 04:09 |
Modelling Combustion in Porous Zone | tanjinjack | FLUENT | 2 | September 26, 2016 04:10 |
Modelling sound propagation through layered porous media | nkinar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 4, 2010 14:45 |
species mass source in porous media ? | PK | FLUENT | 0 | February 16, 2007 11:12 |
porous media: Fluent or Star-CD? | Igor | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 5, 2002 15:16 |