CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

CFX Solver Reynolds Number

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 1, 2012, 00:34
Default CFX Solver Reynolds Number
New Member
Haider Muhammad
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8
haider760 is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

I was simulating simple flow inside a pipe for seeing pressure drop and heat transfer during the flow. I found that Reynolds number that Cfx solver calculates is quite different from the theoretical Reynolds Number.

I went through different threads which states that because cfx uses length scale which is cube root of volume therefore we have this difference.

I have understanding that due to difference of Reynolds number physics of flow will change (i.e laminar flow will be in turbulence regime) and if i have to compare it with some correlation that are based on theoretical Reynolds number, then the comparison may not be appropriate.

I also defined theoretical Reynolds Number using additional variables, but i found that momentum equations are still solved using cfx solver calculated Reynolds Number.

I was wondering if there could be any way that i can define cfx solver reynolds number as the theoretical Reynolds number so that i can compare my results on an equal ground. Or should i ignore this difference in Reynolds Number and still compare my results?

Any help will be appreciated?

haider760 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2012, 18:01
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,214
Rep Power: 110
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
You cannot change the Re number reported in the output file. It is just a guide as to what flow regime the flow is likely to be in, and it can be completely wrong. It is not used in the solver to set anything, it just triggers some warning messages (which can be ignored if not relevant). Just ignore it and use your own definition of Re number.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2012, 23:05
New Member
Haider Muhammad
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8
haider760 is on a distinguished road
Thanks Gorrocks!

It really cleared many doubts!
haider760 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to define the Reynolds Number in CFX? yflin CFX 25 September 7, 2015 00:59
Turbulence model for low Reynolds number flow? Nokadu Main CFD Forum 3 May 26, 2013 11:42
Two way particle coupling in OF 2.0 and the particle reynolds number preichl OpenFOAM 7 February 9, 2012 16:38
Reynolds Number and Heat transfer Coefficient panos_metal FLUENT 0 January 7, 2011 07:37
High Reynolds Number Incompressible Flow Nick Lavery Main CFD Forum 3 February 19, 2002 16:47

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:38.