|
[Sponsors] |
August 6, 2017, 07:00 |
warning in simulation
|
#1 |
Member
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8 |
hi every body
i simulate a section of engine and when do it i meet this warning warning:the total mass of removed parcels is 2.52000e-11 what is the meaning of it? how can i solve it? |
|
August 6, 2017, 13:18 |
|
#2 |
Member
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8 |
could everybody help me please
|
|
August 6, 2017, 21:11 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Blanco
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
It is normal to have parcels removed from the domain, converge simply "neglect" parcels very small which are of no interest from a fluid dynamic perspective, in order to avoid an increase in computational time. Sent from my HUAWEI TAG-L01 using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
||
August 7, 2017, 00:01 |
|
#4 |
Member
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi thaks for reply does this warning cause that combustion dont accure ? Because when i simulation my pressure graph draw motoring state and look like dont accure comustion another words fuel dont burn in my case
|
|
August 7, 2017, 02:19 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 264
Rep Power: 10 |
Well, even if its a low load case and you injected 5mg of fuel, the amount of removed parcel mass is 0.0005%
So that should not affect combustion at all. |
|
August 7, 2017, 03:04 |
|
#6 |
Member
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8 |
then with this explain i have to increase fuel that is true? if or not how can i resolve this problem
|
|
August 7, 2017, 03:40 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 264
Rep Power: 10 |
If you have the exact same fuel in experiment and know the amount to 100.0000%, then yes. But I highly doubt that
2.5e-11 kg of fuel loss seems to be 1 parcel that has been removed. That can not affect your combustion. If your combustion is not taking place you have to look for other reasons. |
|
August 7, 2017, 05:55 |
|
#8 |
Member
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8 |
Could you help me what reasons often cause to dont happen combustion?
|
|
August 7, 2017, 10:48 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Sameera Wijeyakulasuriya
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 10 |
There can be many reasons why the case is showing any combustion. First, can you compare your case set up to a corresponding example case? These example cases are set up to with our recommendations for typical IC Engine flow and combustion. After this step, if you still cannot figure out why your case does not burn please email the case files (*.in and *.dat) to support@convergecfd.com. Please use your official email for all correspondence with Convergent Science.
|
|
August 7, 2017, 13:33 |
|
#10 |
Member
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8 |
Tanks alot for your reply
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] How to define to right point for locationInMesh | Mirage12 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | March 13, 2016 14:07 |
Cells with t below lower limit | Purushothama | Siemens | 2 | May 31, 2010 21:58 |
latest OpenFOAM-1.6.x from git failed to compile | phsieh2005 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 25 | February 9, 2010 04:37 |
Compilation errors in ThirdPartymallochoard | feng_w | OpenFOAM Installation | 1 | January 25, 2009 06:59 |
[OpenFOAM] Could you please help me | liugx212 | ParaView | 4 | December 22, 2005 16:55 |