CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

warning in simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 6, 2017, 07:00
Default warning in simulation
  #1
Member
 
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8
jiliyur is on a distinguished road
hi every body
i simulate a section of engine and when do it i meet this warning
warning:the total mass of removed parcels is 2.52000e-11
what is the meaning of it? how can i solve it?
jiliyur is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2017, 13:18
Default
  #2
Member
 
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8
jiliyur is on a distinguished road
could everybody help me please
jiliyur is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2017, 21:11
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Blanco
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 17
Blanco is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiliyur View Post
hi every body
i simulate a section of engine and when do it i meet this warning
warning:the total mass of removed parcels is 2.52000e-11
what is the meaning of it? how can i solve it?
It's just a warning stating that converge is removing parcels from the domain. The overall removed mass should remain small compared to injected mass, as in your case, moreover if you check your log file you'll find a specific warning obtained at each time step when parcels are effectively removed. This warning report the mass of the par els removed in a single time step, you'll find this to be very small too (something like 1e-12 kg).

It is normal to have parcels removed from the domain, converge simply "neglect" parcels very small which are of no interest from a fluid dynamic perspective, in order to avoid an increase in computational time.

Sent from my HUAWEI TAG-L01 using CFD Online Forum mobile app
Blanco is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 00:01
Default
  #4
Member
 
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8
jiliyur is on a distinguished road
Hi thaks for reply does this warning cause that combustion dont accure ? Because when i simulation my pressure graph draw motoring state and look like dont accure comustion another words fuel dont burn in my case
jiliyur is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 02:19
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 264
Rep Power: 10
MFGT is on a distinguished road
Well, even if its a low load case and you injected 5mg of fuel, the amount of removed parcel mass is 0.0005%

So that should not affect combustion at all.
MFGT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 03:04
Default
  #6
Member
 
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8
jiliyur is on a distinguished road
then with this explain i have to increase fuel that is true? if or not how can i resolve this problem
jiliyur is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 03:40
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Tobias
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 264
Rep Power: 10
MFGT is on a distinguished road
If you have the exact same fuel in experiment and know the amount to 100.0000%, then yes. But I highly doubt that

2.5e-11 kg of fuel loss seems to be 1 parcel that has been removed.
That can not affect your combustion.

If your combustion is not taking place you have to look for other reasons.
MFGT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 05:55
Default
  #8
Member
 
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8
jiliyur is on a distinguished road
Could you help me what reasons often cause to dont happen combustion?
jiliyur is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 10:48
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
SamWijey's Avatar
 
Sameera Wijeyakulasuriya
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 10
SamWijey is on a distinguished road
There can be many reasons why the case is showing any combustion. First, can you compare your case set up to a corresponding example case? These example cases are set up to with our recommendations for typical IC Engine flow and combustion. After this step, if you still cannot figure out why your case does not burn please email the case files (*.in and *.dat) to support@convergecfd.com. Please use your official email for all correspondence with Convergent Science.
__________________
Sameera Wijeyakulasuriya
Principal Engineer, Applications
CONVERGECFD
SamWijey is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 13:33
Default
  #10
Member
 
gasem
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 8
jiliyur is on a distinguished road
Tanks alot for your reply
jiliyur is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] How to define to right point for locationInMesh Mirage12 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 March 13, 2016 14:07
Cells with t below lower limit Purushothama Siemens 2 May 31, 2010 21:58
latest OpenFOAM-1.6.x from git failed to compile phsieh2005 OpenFOAM Bugs 25 February 9, 2010 04:37
Compilation errors in ThirdPartymallochoard feng_w OpenFOAM Installation 1 January 25, 2009 06:59
[OpenFOAM] Could you please help me liugx212 ParaView 4 December 22, 2005 16:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59.