|
[Sponsors] |
August 27, 2009, 17:54 |
Cosmosfloworks or fluent??
|
#1 |
New Member
Hamed Rasouli
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi. I'm a new user of cosmosfloworks.and I have few questions.
Can we compare cosmosfloworks results with fluent results? Which is stronger? Are cosmosfloworks results reliable? Can someone compare a same cfd project in cosmosfloworks and fluent? What are the diffrences? Last edited by hamedhpt; August 31, 2009 at 16:43. |
|
October 3, 2009, 07:35 |
|
#2 | |
New Member
murat
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Turbulence model effects the solution always For fluent you can generate the grid as O-grid,C-grid but you can not generate the grid with FloEFD as Fluent's these domains is important while solving an external analysis So that, Fluent is more reliable code than FloEFD |
||
October 3, 2009, 12:02 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Hamed Rasouli
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
But in FloEFD it uses a model called I-L.Do you know what this model is? especially it is said that this model is independent from Y+ calculation. |
||
October 5, 2009, 06:09 |
|
#4 |
New Member
YY
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
For common problems, I believe that these two softwares have not too much difference with results. But fluent has more functional ways to solve complicated fluid problems.
|
|
October 11, 2009, 17:36 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
murat
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
I-L means that Turbulence Intensity and Length and if you want to declaration k-epsilon with I-L It is same |
||
December 21, 2009, 09:43 |
|
#6 |
New Member
diki
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16 |
i do agree with you. fluent give more function. FW give more ease and good integrated GUI with the preproc for geometrical operation. most advanced users uses fluent if i not mistaken. i use FW, though.
|
|
January 6, 2010, 12:03 |
Flo-Fluent benchmark
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi everyone.
I am currently using both softwares , so I can maybe give you some relevant information. I tried the two softwares on a simple case of heat conduction in a extruded aluminium profile, with free convection around. The results of the two softwares were close to each other ( diffrence< 1°C on maximal surface temperature). so I think tht in this particular case, the two softwares are relevant. We tried also to compare the simulation results with physical meauserments on prototypes and both softwares were really near the physical measurement ( difference < 10%) Now, if you are looking for more accurate models about combustion, mixng, chemicals, turbulence treatment, I also think that Fluent is better the Flo Hope these few words will help you |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stopping a Fluent batch job AND saving the data! Possible? | Volker Pawlik | FLUENT | 13 | December 28, 2020 05:16 |
Two questions on Fluent UDF | Steven | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | March 23, 2018 04:22 |
Problems in lauching FLUENT | Lourival | FLUENT | 3 | January 16, 2008 17:48 |
FLUENT versions ... | Gautam | FLUENT | 3 | November 1, 2007 11:49 |
Run Fluent in batch mode | Shengping LUO | FLUENT | 2 | October 24, 2000 06:42 |