CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > FLOW-3D

Mesh resolution to capture thin solid regions

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By JBurnham

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 19, 2013, 00:38
Default Mesh resolution to capture thin solid regions
  #1
Member
 
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15
Akshay is on a distinguished road
Hey Guys

I have a solid region with a small thickness. How do i make sure that the mesh captures these thin regions. Interestingly even when I have a super fine mesh(order of 10 mil), it does not capture these solids. Is there any special way?

Thanks
Akshay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2013, 01:57
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Jeff Burnham
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 17
JBurnham is on a distinguished road
There are three ways:

1) make the mesh cells small enough that there are 3 cells across the thinnest region.

2) if the region is too thin for (1), then consider using a baffle (which is 2-D, and lies on the grid lines) instead of a component (which is 3-D, and needs to be resolved by cells). Note that because baffles snap to the nearest gridline, they will make stair-steps if they're angled diagonal to the mesh. Complex baffles can be imported from .stl files in v10.1 and later.

3) if possible, consider making the regions thicker in CAD. For example, extrude topography surfaces downward. Make sure to re-check and fix the .stl file after you export it, like maybe with netfabb Studio.
brucecumt likes this.
JBurnham is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2013, 00:29
Default
  #3
Member
 
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15
Akshay is on a distinguished road
Thanks Burnham but....

The baffles option will not work for me because my model is a moving object. And I don't think I can increase the thickness considering my case. So the only option left is to resolve it through a finer mesh.
I've attached an image(notice it has a small thickness). Now how can I setup mesh planes(grid points) for such a geometry so that I can capture the entire model. Is there any quick way for such situations?

Akshay
Attached Images
File Type: png img1.png (17.2 KB, 30 views)
Akshay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2013, 00:31
Default
  #4
Member
 
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15
Akshay is on a distinguished road
MultiBlocks!!?? One block contained in another? Will that work?
Akshay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2013, 12:35
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Jeff Burnham
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 17
JBurnham is on a distinguished road
Yes, you can nest finer blocks inside larger blocks. FLOW-3D will change the boundary condition in the nested block to "inter-block" type automatically. However, the nested blocks do not move, so they can't follow the moving object. Good luck.
JBurnham is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 24, 2013, 07:54
Default
  #6
Member
 
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15
Akshay is on a distinguished road
I'll let you know what happens. And..
What is the usual cell count for complex meshes/physics used in Flow3D?
Akshay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 31, 2013, 11:38
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Jeff Burnham
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 17
JBurnham is on a distinguished road
Cell count depends on how much memory you have. In general:

cell counts in the hundreds will run in seconds
cell counts in the thousands will run in minutes
hundreds of thousands of cells run in hours or days
millions of cells take days or weeks to run
JBurnham is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2016, 01:53
Default about the boundary condition in the nested block
  #8
New Member
 
XuYan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
jyoen is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBurnham View Post
Yes, you can nest finer blocks inside larger blocks. FLOW-3D will change the boundary condition in the nested block to "inter-block" type automatically. However, the nested blocks do not move, so they can't follow the moving object. Good luck.
FLOW-3D will change the boundary condition in the nested block to "inter-block" type automatically.So we needn't set the boundary condition of nested block?
jyoen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2016, 04:54
Default
  #9
New Member
 
hanif pourshahbaz
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 9
hanif pourshahbaz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyoen View Post
FLOW-3D will change the boundary condition in the nested block to "inter-block" type automatically.So we needn't set the boundary condition of nested block?
Hi

it depends on your problem
but in most cases you can simply use symmetry for boundary conditions

Regards
Hanif
hanif pourshahbaz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2016, 22:52
Default
  #10
New Member
 
XuYan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
jyoen is on a distinguished road
Hi

Yeah, I also think so.

For example, if the inter-block doesn't have superposition boundaries with outer-block , we can just choose the symmetry for inner-block. But if it has, I think maybe the superposition boundary conditions should be the same as the outer-block's. I will do experiments to text and verify it .

Thank you very much. It's important for my research.

Best

Jyoen
jyoen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2016, 06:12
Default
  #11
New Member
 
hanif pourshahbaz
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 9
hanif pourshahbaz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyoen View Post
Hi

Yeah, I also think so.

For example, if the inter-block doesn't have superposition boundaries with outer-block , we can just choose the symmetry for inner-block. But if it has, I think maybe the superposition boundary conditions should be the same as the outer-block's. I will do experiments to text and verify it .

Thank you very much. It's important for my research.

Best

Jyoen
you are exactly right
and we have done this part in our work
you get my point

Regards,
Hanif
hanif pourshahbaz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2016, 09:34
Default
  #12
New Member
 
XuYan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
jyoen is on a distinguished road
Dear Hanif,

It's cool! Thanks for your reply. It helps me save much time to verify it.

Best

Jyoen
jyoen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2016, 10:48
Default
  #13
New Member
 
hanif pourshahbaz
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 9
hanif pourshahbaz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyoen View Post
Dear Hanif,

It's cool! Thanks for your reply. It helps me save much time to verify it.

Best

Jyoen
your wellcome

Regards,
Hanif
hanif pourshahbaz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors DarrenC ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 August 5, 2013 06:42
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature giulio.topazio OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 August 22, 2012 09:03
erroneous temps in conjugate model? sieginc. STAR-CCM+ 11 July 14, 2012 03:41
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 January 15, 2010 19:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:38.