|
[Sponsors] |
Mesh resolution to capture thin solid regions |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 19, 2013, 00:38 |
Mesh resolution to capture thin solid regions
|
#1 |
Member
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15 |
Hey Guys
I have a solid region with a small thickness. How do i make sure that the mesh captures these thin regions. Interestingly even when I have a super fine mesh(order of 10 mil), it does not capture these solids. Is there any special way? Thanks |
|
December 22, 2013, 01:57 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Jeff Burnham
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 17 |
There are three ways:
1) make the mesh cells small enough that there are 3 cells across the thinnest region. 2) if the region is too thin for (1), then consider using a baffle (which is 2-D, and lies on the grid lines) instead of a component (which is 3-D, and needs to be resolved by cells). Note that because baffles snap to the nearest gridline, they will make stair-steps if they're angled diagonal to the mesh. Complex baffles can be imported from .stl files in v10.1 and later. 3) if possible, consider making the regions thicker in CAD. For example, extrude topography surfaces downward. Make sure to re-check and fix the .stl file after you export it, like maybe with netfabb Studio. |
|
December 23, 2013, 00:29 |
|
#3 |
Member
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks Burnham but....
The baffles option will not work for me because my model is a moving object. And I don't think I can increase the thickness considering my case. So the only option left is to resolve it through a finer mesh. I've attached an image(notice it has a small thickness). Now how can I setup mesh planes(grid points) for such a geometry so that I can capture the entire model. Is there any quick way for such situations? Akshay |
|
December 23, 2013, 00:31 |
|
#4 |
Member
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15 |
MultiBlocks!!?? One block contained in another? Will that work?
|
|
December 23, 2013, 12:35 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Jeff Burnham
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 17 |
Yes, you can nest finer blocks inside larger blocks. FLOW-3D will change the boundary condition in the nested block to "inter-block" type automatically. However, the nested blocks do not move, so they can't follow the moving object. Good luck.
|
|
December 24, 2013, 07:54 |
|
#6 |
Member
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 15 |
I'll let you know what happens. And..
What is the usual cell count for complex meshes/physics used in Flow3D? |
|
December 31, 2013, 11:38 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Jeff Burnham
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 204
Rep Power: 17 |
Cell count depends on how much memory you have. In general:
cell counts in the hundreds will run in seconds cell counts in the thousands will run in minutes hundreds of thousands of cells run in hours or days millions of cells take days or weeks to run |
|
November 2, 2016, 01:53 |
about the boundary condition in the nested block
|
#8 |
New Member
XuYan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
FLOW-3D will change the boundary condition in the nested block to "inter-block" type automatically.So we needn't set the boundary condition of nested block?
|
|
November 2, 2016, 04:54 |
|
#9 | |
New Member
hanif pourshahbaz
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
it depends on your problem but in most cases you can simply use symmetry for boundary conditions Regards Hanif |
||
November 2, 2016, 22:52 |
|
#10 |
New Member
XuYan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi
Yeah, I also think so. For example, if the inter-block doesn't have superposition boundaries with outer-block , we can just choose the symmetry for inner-block. But if it has, I think maybe the superposition boundary conditions should be the same as the outer-block's. I will do experiments to text and verify it . Thank you very much. It's important for my research. Best Jyoen |
|
November 3, 2016, 06:12 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
hanif pourshahbaz
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
and we have done this part in our work you get my point Regards, Hanif |
||
November 3, 2016, 09:34 |
|
#12 |
New Member
XuYan
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear Hanif,
It's cool! Thanks for your reply. It helps me save much time to verify it. Best Jyoen |
|
November 3, 2016, 10:48 |
|
#13 |
New Member
hanif pourshahbaz
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 9 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 06:20 |
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors | DarrenC | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 11 | August 5, 2013 06:42 |
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature | giulio.topazio | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | August 22, 2012 09:03 |
erroneous temps in conjugate model? | sieginc. | STAR-CCM+ | 11 | July 14, 2012 03:41 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 19:43 |