
[Sponsors] 
Mass Flow Rate or Mass Flow Distribution 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
March 6, 2020, 09:07 
Mass Flow Rate or Mass Flow Distribution

#1 
Member
Raj
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 2 
Hello all,
I know it seems to be basic question or it might be a big mistake. Please excuse me and help me. My model as a number of inlets and one outlet. One type of fluid flows in one inlet and the rest of them have other fluid. So, I have a total of two fluids. I have two velocity inlets and one pressure outlet with default settings of physics, solution method, and controls. I have been trying for velocity profile and mass flow distribution. But when I hybrid initialize, plot and calculate. I get a mass flow rate graph as follows in the attached image. I cannot see any values on Yaxis? Please let me know, what all changes could I make or what is the problem. Thank you Raj 

March 8, 2020, 04:43 
Values on abcissa

#2 
Senior Member

The values are there but too small for the format chosen. You need to change the format to either scientific notation or increase the number of significant digits.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared on the Forum 

March 8, 2020, 11:35 

#3 
Member
Raj
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 2 
Hello Vinerm,
I am afraid, I could not get the point. The model, I'm working on, has very small dimensions around in mm. The meshing size is also around 0.0001 mm. Did you mean this data? Or can you please brief me on the solution or suggest the settings or steps necessary? Thank you Raj 

March 8, 2020, 12:09 
Data on yaxis

#4 
Senior Member

What I meant is that the field reported on the yaxis have rather small values, may be of the order of 0.000001. Now, if you display only four significant digits, number will appear as zero. However, if you use scientific notation for the plot, these will appear as 1.23e6.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared on the Forum 

March 8, 2020, 12:41 

#5 
Member
Raj
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 2 
Hey Vinerm,
Yeah, thank you for your detailed reply. Yeah, I got some results. It seems weird because all the values in Y abscissa are the same i.e., the value which I got, while I computed in mass flow rate. Could you please give it a look and remark it? Thank you Raj 

March 8, 2020, 12:46 
Setup

#6 
Senior Member

No comments could be made about it until the case details are known. What you should check is the difference between mass flow rates at the inlets and the outlet. If the difference is very small as compared to flow rates at the inlets and outlet, say, less than 1%, then it is alright. Else, the case is not converged. Usually, a multiphase flow will not converge in 200 iterations, until it is a simple pipe flow. Secondly, mass flow error for multiphase flow is usually high, i.e., it is difficult to get mass conservation in a multiphase flow.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared on the Forum 

March 9, 2020, 05:07 

#7 
Member
Raj
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 2 
Okay. I am posting some information. Hope it could help me


March 9, 2020, 05:12 
Mass Conservation

#8 
Senior Member

The problem is with mass conservation. Are the fluids immiscible, like air and water? And are you running the simulation in double precision? For such small numbers, double precision would improve the accuracy. Secondly, the residuals appear to have stalled. Try changing the numerical scheme or URFs. Prefer Coupled with Pseduotransient or run the simulation as transient for better convergence. You may also try changing the gradient limiter to celltocell instead of default. This will help with stalled residuals.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared on the Forum 

March 9, 2020, 05:22 

#9 
Member
Raj
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 2 
Yeah, the fluids are immiscible. I am running in Double precision. Also, I have used Coupled with Pseduotransient as my model is steady.
"You may also try changing the gradient limiter to celltocell instead of the default. This will help with stalled residuals." I did not understand this, how can I do this? 

March 9, 2020, 07:06 
Advanced Options

#10 
Senior Member

This is available under Solution Controls > Advanced.
Since you have two immiscible fluids, I suppose you have gravity enabled, provided density ratio is high enough for gravity to have a significant effect. Furthermore, which multiphase model are you using?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared on the Forum 

March 9, 2020, 09:29 

#11 
Member
Raj
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 2 
I will change the spatial discretization to celltocell and try to simulate.
Yeah, it is a highdensity model. At present, I am just testing it with a single fluid. I will be using the VOF model in further cases. To make the simulation more practical, I have applied gravity. But, I have no idea it will affect the model's density ratio. Should I disable gravity or what should I consider? 

March 9, 2020, 11:02 
Gradient Limiter and Gravity

#12 
Senior Member

For high density ratio system, gravity is a must. Gravity does not affect the density ratio, rather it affects the fluid flow if the density ratio is high. Gravity should always be enabled in your system and in the correct direction. Additionally, operating pressure reference location and operating density should be accurately specified.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared on the Forum 

March 9, 2020, 11:11 

#13 
Member
Raj
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 2 
Yeah, everything is fine then. I will just update all settings and try again.
Thanks, Mr. Vinerm Best Regards Raj 

Tags 
mass flow distribution, mass flow rate, mass flow rate inlet 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Mass flow rate history over solution step rhoSimpleFoam  gian93  OpenFOAM PostProcessing  0  December 8, 2019 10:20 
boundary condition with pressure AND mass flow rate  tsi07  FLUENT  1  July 20, 2017 08:39 
Calculating mass flow rate at multiphase flows  Kuslo187  OpenFOAM PostProcessing  1  August 21, 2015 18:11 
Mass flow rate through each cell  Babakjingo  Main CFD Forum  0  August 21, 2011 03:18 
Mass flow rate  sepidecent  CFX  0  August 9, 2011 00:15 