|
[Sponsors] |
c_phase_diameter (at the wall) vs departure diameter |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Alexandros
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi everybody !
In multiphase wall boiling modeling (Eulerian), it seems that there are two ways to export departure diameter from fluent. The first is to create udf files for each of the departure diameter included in fluent (but also for new ones) and apply a line for keeping the value in memory. The second is to create a udf file that will be used as a standalone function based on "execute on demand" logic. We used both approaches. The variable used for the second option was C_PHASE_DIAMETER. (We hoped that at the wall this function would provide the departure diameter only...) However, by comparing the results, it seems that by using the second approach we do have results at points where boiling is not expected (in adiabatic instead of heated walls for example) and the results are somewhat different. Have anybody experienced a similar problem? ![]() Thanks in advance, Alex |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
departure diameter, fluent, multiphase, wall boiling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Table bounds warnings at: END OF TIME STEP | CFXer | CFX | 4 | July 16, 2020 23:44 |
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! | Yr0gErG | FLUENT | 4 | December 2, 2019 00:04 |
Centrifugal fan-reverse flow in outlet lesds to a mass in flow field | xiexing | CFX | 3 | March 29, 2017 10:00 |
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem | Sanyo | CFX | 17 | August 15, 2015 06:20 |
Wall functions | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 5, 1999 01:16 |