 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
February 24, 2012, 11:05
|
d2T/dx2 = 0 instead of dT/dx = 0 (outflow)
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Chahinez
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15  |
Hi everybody,
I have a big problem with boundary conditions of Fluent. I want to impose in the outlet of my conduct d2T/dx2 = 0 and there is no boudary condition doing that. For big Reynolds Number, I can put "outflow" (so dT/dx = 0) as a condition in outlet 'cause it has no big influence. But my problem deals with very small Reynolds numbers and so, outflow causes big trouble in my work and solution is false. Can anybody help me? Ps: I have a fluid in my duct so don't confuse with UDF that are reserved to walls or solids in general. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| dt/dx, heat flux, outflow, udf, uds |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Outflow boundary Control Volume SIMPLE Help !!! | Mizerable | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 22, 2011 13:00 |
| No outflow - Error | sErik | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 18, 2009 11:10 |
| mass flux correction at outflow boundaries | Subhra Datta | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 24, 2003 13:11 |
| outflow boudary condition in SIMPLE algorithm | dallybird | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 6, 2003 11:55 |
| Outflow Bocos | Romuald Skoda | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 6, 1999 03:08 |
Linear Mode
