Convergence of Cyclone Analysis
1 Attachment(s)
Hi all,
I did the analysis of Cyclone separators and I found monitor of mass flow rate at outlet is fluctuating. please see the attachment. Is the solution converged? 
Quote:

There are fluctuations, but they seem very small within this range
I would look for the following in a converged simulation: 1) mass is conserved (e.g. same mass flux coming in and exiting the domain) 2) generally speaking, all residuals decrease smoothly below some low value 3) if no energy is added to the flow, total temperature on all exits should add up to the total inlet temperature, meaning (m_dot_in * T_in = m_dot_1 * T_1 + m_dot_2 * T_2 + ... ) 4) mass/temperature/velocity etc outlet monitors should occupy a stable numerical value when plotted over a sizeable range of iterations Hope this helps 
On the image m_dot has been plotted over the last 90 cycles. It is best for one to plot a monitor over a large range of cycles (in your case, say, 3000  4000, as an example) in order to see how this monitor has been behaving throughout a sizeable part of the simulation.

Thanks for your help,
My residuals are fluctuating in cyclic manner, from one research paper i found that the solution must be changed to transient one. i dint know how to decide the time step and if i run transient run then how should i know that my solution is converged, and how to analyse the final results of transient run. Thank You... 
Quote:
For transient run, your timestep should be small enough to resolve the main flow structures (the unsteady features). If the unsteady feature has a timescale of say 1s, then some fraction of 1s is needed or you will not resolve the unsteady features. Less than 1/3 is recommended, 1/10 or more if you want to be safe. Again, you need to know beforehand what the timescale of these features are, do not do it blindly or you will only get lost! If you don't know these timescales then you probably do not need to be doing a transient simulation yet. Your solution must be converged at the current timestep before you can move to the next one. Hence, it is even more important that you define convergence well beforehand. If you find that it is taking too many iterations to converge at the current timestep, you can reduce your timestep size. You will end up computing more timesteps but it will make it easier to converge each timestep. If your solution converges easily then consider increasing the timestep size (as long as you can still resolve the unsteady features using the 1/3 or 1/10 guideline). Additionally, typically the timestep is also sometimes chosen to satisfy stability criteria (checkout CFL number). 
All times are GMT 4. The time now is 03:05. 