|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Dear all,
I want to simulate a transient case for an incompressible fluid (mixture: contrast agent bolus in blood) using a segregated solver and have some general questions concerning the CFL-number: I read in some threads that the CFL-number ist important for stability reasons at coupled solvers. But do I have to take care of the CFL-number at segregated solvers as well? And is it just a stability reason or may I also get wrong results if I choose a time step which is too large for my grid or a grid size which is too small (at using a segregated solver as well)? I just thought I might get wrong results since my contrast agent bolus would "jump over" some grid-elements then... Thank you for all your help and ideas, Lilly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Sorry, I meant CFL-number, of course!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,834
Rep Power: 68 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You only need to focus on CFL number for the explicit time-stepping. For implicit time-stepping (stability is guaranteed). The way implicit time-stepping scheme is handled in Fluent it is dummyproof (as there are iterations in-between) and you can do iterations as large as you like. For explicit time-stepping you will have both of the problems you mentioned: 1) stability and 2) the case of grid jumping so CFL number is very important. That said, maintaining the proper CFL number even for the implicit time-stepping helps drastically to improve its convergence at each time-step. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Thank you for your helpful explanation LuckyTran!
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CFD Salary | CFD | Main CFD Forum | 17 | January 3, 2017 18:09 |
| Problem with parallel run | Hisham | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | March 13, 2012 09:31 |
| [blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |
| Solver is finishing with huge Mach number | Fonzie | CFX | 1 | March 12, 2007 15:15 |
| Traps | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 29 | September 29, 2001 16:31 |