|
[Sponsors] |
May 9, 2012, 09:48 |
Y+ < 1 for Standard K-Epsilon
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 14 |
for a 5 cm diameter cylinder of which air is passing through at 2m/s, I have a mesh resolution of around 70 nodes for that diameter.
Would this explain why my y+ values are very small? And is this going to lead to errors? I've been reading around and people are quoting very positive numbers like >30. |
|
May 9, 2012, 14:40 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,673
Rep Power: 65 |
Quote:
If your mesh is uniform then your y+ will likely by much greater. If you used clustered grid nodes near the wall then it is very possible. You can have y+ < .1 if your edge growth rate is high. Small y+ is great and way more accurate than high y+ meshes. Use it if you can afford it. Just make use you are using the low Reynolds number approach for your wall modelling (usually the fluent default). If not Fluent, what turbulence model and wall modelling are you using? |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | March 4, 2017 08:30 |
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence | jonmec | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 28, 2011 05:24 |
How to get reference to k and epsilon in the epsEqn and kEqn | cfd_explorer | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | March 10, 2011 10:16 |
How to get reference to k and epsilon in the epsEqn and kEqn | cfd_explorer | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 10, 2011 09:58 |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 20:21 |