CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   FLUENT (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/)
-   -   Running NASA rotor 67 case on FLUENT (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/111552-running-nasa-rotor-67-case-fluent.html)

radix January 9, 2013 14:43

Running NASA rotor 67 case on FLUENT
 
Has anybody a case of NASA rotor 67 on FLUENT? I have been trying to simulate this case for a couple of months with no convincing results.

I built the mesh with maximum skewness of 0.84. Is this a possible skewness to run the case in FLUENT? The difficulty in meshing the rotor, due to the twisting from the hub to the tip, is to get a structured mesh with low skewness number.

I am willingly to provide any data should it be required to help you understand the problem.

Regards,
Raditya

rvl565 April 30, 2014 15:36

Hi,

Were you able to simulate the rotor?

CFD-fellow April 30, 2014 17:51

Hi
You can use facial boundary layer mesh in Gambit(its easy and fast)
OR introduce your geometry to BLADEGEN (this is difficult) then mesh with TurboGrid (it gives really high quality hex. mesh)
Regards

rvl565 April 30, 2014 22:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by CFD-fellow (Post 489204)
Hi
You can use facial boundary layer mesh in Gambit(its easy and fast)
OR introduce your geometry to BLADEGEN (this is difficult) then mesh with TurboGrid (it gives really high quality hex. mesh)
Regards

Hi,

Have you simulated rotor 67? I wanted a little help with my simulation.

CFD-fellow May 1, 2014 10:05

Hi
No, but Ive done some turbomachinery analyses with high accuracy(most with water as working fluid).
You can ask your questions. Have you read this?:
http://hv.diva-portal.org/smash/get/...FULLTEXT01.pdf
Regards

rvl565 May 2, 2014 14:19

Hi,

thanks a lot for the reply!
I started a thread regarding this, ( i have explained my problem in detail)
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...on-fluent.html

Yes i have read the report.
Can you help me with this?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01.