|
[Sponsors] |
February 24, 2013, 20:11 |
Advice on Pump Outlet BC
|
#1 |
New Member
Gordon
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I am performing a comparative analysis a regen pumps, modifying the inlet and outlet of it to observe the effect performance. For a couple of weeks now I have been using the mass flow inlet or velocity inlet in conjunction with outflow BC to obtain my pressure rise. I realise now this is incorrect. The model is set up using MRF, with the impeller fluid as the rotating zone, and the corresponding walls rotating with it. The annular fluid is stationary. My geometry is based on previous research, for which there was a test rig. I do not have all the test data, however I do know the free surface height above inlet, the mass flow and diameter of the pipe, so can calculate the static pressure at the suction side. Using pressure-inlet BC I set total pressure to the static (above gauge) as calculated, operating pressure is zero (for incompressible fluids, water) It is important to note that the model does not include all the length and height of the pipework as it would be in real life, the inlet and outlet are only a 50mm portion My problem comes with defining the outlet side BC. Since mass is conserved, and the outlet dia = inlet, the fully developed velocity will be the same. I have tried umpteen variances on the pressure-outlet BC, such as setting a high outlet pressure, setting to zero gauge, target mass flow rate. Either I get a pressure drop across the pump, or the fluid is forced back through the pump to the inlet side. I know that empirical data was previously collected, and the write up for that mentions that the pressure BCs where based on the measured values. In my case I do not have the opportunity to carry out experiments, but I MUST find the pressure rise across the pump. Any help greatly appreciated. |
|
February 26, 2013, 15:20 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana, US
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 17 |
Why do you say that using the outflow BC is incorrect?
Regards Luke |
|
February 26, 2013, 15:38 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Gordon
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
I have since run the problem using pressure inlet and target mass flow rate at pressure outlet from the command line approach and I get good results on the outlet pressure, however, it takes in excess of 1000 iterations for the outlet mass flow to become stable. Is there a quicker method? |
||
February 26, 2013, 15:58 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana, US
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Thought you said you used a mass flow/velocity inlet with the outflow. That shud work the best Regards Luke |
||
February 26, 2013, 17:10 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Gordon
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13 |
That's correct, but I don't get the right head rise. Pathlines are all good, fluid behaves as it should for this application. Only way that I can get the result is using the method I described above, but it is rather cumbersome.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 15:45 |
Regenerative pump modelled in FLOEFD pro | YYY | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 2 | October 5, 2009 05:04 |
large vortex on outlet when gravity accounted for | Alejandra Menchaca | Phoenics | 0 | March 3, 2009 19:53 |
inlet and outlet boundary condition of pump | Thammasak | CFX | 0 | February 9, 2004 13:02 |
Impinging Jet. Outlet Boundary Condition | Vincent | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 16, 2003 10:49 |