|
[Sponsors] |
March 1, 2013, 11:28 |
Convection in a refrigerator
|
#1 |
New Member
Çağlar Coşkun
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello
I am trying to simulate the mixed convection of the air inside of a household refrigerator cabin for my thesis. Geometry is somewhat complex (shelves, drawers, compartments etc.) My case is transient. It includes the stops and starts of compressor of the refrigerator, so boundary conditions are time-dependent. The temperatures at certain points inside the refrigerator cabin are fluctuating with respect to the boundary conditions. My problem is, the temperatures of numeric results are not as responsive as the experimental data. An example comparison is given in an Excel file in the link below. As you can see the plot in the file, the initial temperatures of experimental and numeric data are almost the same, but as the time passes the error between them increases. What can you suggest about this? My settings are as follows: Turbulence Model: Spalart - Allmaras Boussinesq approximation is used for density changes Pressure, Momentum, Energy and Turbulent viscosity schemes: 2. Order Upwind. Pressure - Velocity Scheme: SIMPLE Under - relaxation factors are default. Time step: 10 sec. The file is in the following link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/53986989/dd7...nuc_forum.xlsx Thanks in advance... Last edited by CaglarCoskun; March 2, 2013 at 05:08. |
|
March 2, 2013, 14:24 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Çağlar Coşkun
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 14 |
Hey!
Any ideas? =) |
|
March 3, 2013, 13:26 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
Why did you choose de S-A turbulence model? Maybe you should try a 2-equations model (- or -).
From the Fluent Theory Guide: "The Spalart-Allmaras model was developed for aerodynamic flows. It is not calibrated for general industrial flows, and does produce relatively larger errors for some free shear flows, especially plane and round jet flows. In addition, it cannot be relied on to predict the decay of homogeneous, isotropic turbulence." |
|
March 3, 2013, 13:51 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Çağlar Coşkun
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks for your reply.
I have read the part about turbulence models in Theory Guide. In my problem, I did some steady simulations to validate my mesh at first. In that steady simulations, I tried Spalart - Allmaras, K - e, and K - w and their variants. However, I got the most accurate results by the Spalart - Allmaras turbulence model, so I am still going on with Spalart - Allmaras. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simulation of Rayleigh-Benard convection | n0name | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 27, 2014 13:49 |
simulation problem -- convection BC | pras | FLUENT | 4 | January 30, 2013 10:41 |
Modeling both radiation and convection on surfaces - Ansys Transient Thermal R13 | s.mishra | ANSYS | 0 | March 31, 2012 04:12 |
natural convection problem with radiation | jorien | CFX | 0 | October 14, 2011 09:26 |
no-frost refrigerator | ozgur | CFX | 2 | August 6, 2008 20:11 |