# Volume flow rate (l/s) as boundary

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 March 14, 2013, 10:32 Volume flow rate (l/s) as boundary #1 Senior Member   Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 7 Hello! I have two question: 1- Is it possible in FLUENT to set the boundary as volume flow rate (liter/Sec) for inlet and outlet? 2- Is it possible in Fluent to measure a surface area or curve length? for instance I want to measure the area of the inlet. Thanks.

 March 14, 2013, 12:22 #2 Senior Member   François Grégoire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Laval University, Canada Posts: 389 Rep Power: 10 Volume flow inlet is not available in the boundary conditions. Here is how you measure the inlet area: 1. Read mesh: File\Read\Mesh... 2. Initialize without setting anything: Solution\Solution Initialization\Initialize 3. Measure inlet area: Results\Reports\Surface Integrals => Report Type : Area => Surfaces : the inlet

 March 14, 2013, 12:49 #3 Senior Member   Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 7 Thanks for your reply! I have the values just as Liter/Sec for my inlet ans outlets. If l/s is not available, since my fluid is ideal gas, how can I handle it? thanks.

 March 14, 2013, 12:55 #4 Senior Member   François Grégoire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Laval University, Canada Posts: 389 Rep Power: 10 Divide volume flow rate by inlet area, what units do you get? stuart23 likes this.

 March 14, 2013, 14:10 #5 Senior Member   Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 7 Sorry, I am new in the fluent, so sorry about my questions I mean about the outlet, I have now the volume flow rate which I convert to velocity. which type of boundary condition available in Fluent I should choose? Should I choose Velocity-int but assign opposite direction? thanks.

 March 14, 2013, 14:16 #6 Senior Member   François Grégoire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Laval University, Canada Posts: 389 Rep Power: 10 typical outlet boundary condition : pressure outlet, leave Gauge Pressure to 0 Pascal (keep default settings) after simulation, verify mass balance : Results\Reports\Mass Flow Rate => choose inlet and outlet under 'Boundaries' => Compute

 March 14, 2013, 15:33 #7 Senior Member   Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 7 I think you become misunderstood!!!! I should assign a value for the outlet. Is is not a pressure-outlet type. a known amount of flow should extract from the outlet.

 March 14, 2013, 15:48 #8 Senior Member   François Grégoire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Laval University, Canada Posts: 389 Rep Power: 10 Yes, exactly, I'm misunderstood. You have 1 or multiple outlet(s)? Infiltration, exfiltration? If there is only 1 outlet, why impose a mass outflow, it's necessarily the same amount than the inflow in steady-state. Steady-state or transient? stuart23 likes this.

 March 14, 2013, 15:55 #9 Senior Member   Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 7 Yes, Multi outlet and Steady.

 March 14, 2013, 16:12 #10 Senior Member   François Grégoire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Laval University, Canada Posts: 389 Rep Power: 10 Then use Outflow boundary condition and adjust the Flow Rate Weightings or Use Pressure Outlet or Outlet Vent boundary condition, turn on Target Mass Flow Rate and enter targeted values. You should compare the results and the mass balance in order to choose the most appropriate for your problem. asal likes this.

 March 16, 2013, 09:44 #11 Senior Member   Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 7 Hello again. I try two method in last couple of days, First Out-Vent and second Velocity outlet. Since for both, the same amount of flow extracted from the outlets, but I got totally different results! and I have no any experiment to compare. what should I do? Any suggestion? Additionally, there is another problem!! The whole amount of flow (kg/s) extracted from the all outlets are a bit smaller than the flow impose to the inlet (kg/s). this additional flow should be extracted from one leakage boundary (Pressure outlet). But fluent reported: "reversed flow in ** faces on pressure-outlet **. " I don't know what is the problem?!!! Any idea/solution? Thanks Last edited by asal; March 17, 2013 at 06:01.

 March 17, 2013, 19:07 #12 New Member   amin masumi Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 17 Rep Power: 7 hi dear, I think you should learn some experimental problems that usually occur in modelling 1. usually we can not extract the exact data from modelling and ''a bit'' is not so important 2. back flow in fluent modeling is not so important and usually we have this note bye fluent, I had a piston pump modelling that we got the best results but every time got a note about back flow In fluent help articles, you can read about this note 3. you should use mechanics fundamentals to know if your data extract by modelling is correct or not and don't forget every time they are not exactly correct but they should be near by correct.

 March 17, 2013, 22:44 #13 Senior Member   François Grégoire Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Laval University, Canada Posts: 389 Rep Power: 10 Asal, maybe you could try to refine the mesh and see if the different boundary conditions eventually produce the same results. You will find tons of information about how to perform grid independency study on the forum. Here's some tips in order to avoid backflow: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...ow-outlet.html And there is probably tons of other threads about backflow.

 April 30, 2015, 09:49 Reversed flow at the pump outlet #14 New Member     Binama Maxime Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Harbin-China Posts: 7 Rep Power: 4 Hi everybody! I have a problem and I ' ll appreciate any help ! I am simulating the fluid flow through a centrifugal pump but I am having a reversed flow at the outlet !this problem appears Right after starting the calculation, ! My BC is velocity in-pressure out ! I am wondering if this can't affect the results in a way or another! Another question is about the pressure prediction at the inlet ! it is always negative (-) ! I think this can't allow me to calculate the total developed Head and all other head related parameters! Is there any method I can use to have positive values of pressure at the inlet ! I just started using this software so I do not know much about it !! thank u

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55 stanley FLUENT 1 February 2, 2007 07:44 Tudor Miron CFX 15 April 2, 2004 06:18 Tudor Miron CFX 17 March 19, 2004 20:23 ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top