|
[Sponsors] |
April 30, 2013, 20:02 |
Mesh Refinement
|
#1 |
New Member
Natali
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello guys,
I am wondering why I cannot reach to a stable and unchanged results when I am doing mesh refinement in many steps. Now, I refined the mesh almost 7 times smaller but th changes are huge compared with the last step. Really thanks, Natali |
|
April 30, 2013, 20:46 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Natali
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 13 |
||
May 1, 2013, 02:30 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 25 |
How small is your mesh? You could be picking up transients in the flow. Maybe switch to the transient solver with a small timestep?
|
|
May 1, 2013, 03:50 |
|
#5 | |
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
What type of flow you are analysing? |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 08:54 |
[Workbench] mesh refinement of vortex tube using workbench | aqsa1590 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | December 25, 2014 08:57 |
[snappyHexMesh] snapEdge - failure | Tobi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 33 | March 18, 2014 03:58 |
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation | Doginal | CFX | 2 | January 12, 2014 06:21 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |