|
[Sponsors] |
June 5, 2013, 21:42 |
|
#21 |
Member
Linyx
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
NO, it is stead-state, it just increasing the angle of attack 1 degree a time, and decreasing 1 degree a time, difference will present in the loop of hysteresis.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...45782501003826 |
|
June 6, 2013, 06:31 |
|
#22 | |
Senior Member
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 341
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
1. I read the paper but I don't really get its point. What they do, is just to use the previous solution as initial condition for the next angle. However, the airfoil is not in a continuous pitching/plunging motion. Rather, it's at a fixed angle and the solution is steady state. So, why hysteresis? I tried to find Hoffman's paper (Effects of freestream turbulence in the performance characteristics of an airfoil) that it's in the references there but I couldn't so if anyone has it, pm me please... I would refer you to these papers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...76042197000122 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AIAAJ..32.2359E (just to name a few, there are a lot more...) 2. I also refer you to post #15
__________________
Lefteris |
||
June 6, 2013, 08:24 |
|
#23 |
Member
Linyx
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
Well, I cannot find that paper either. I did my case as they did, the same thing happend, the loop is around 25-30 angles, so the aerodynamic around these angles needs to take care. Actually their paper is not steady state all the time, during decreasing angles, the stalled wings needs to solve it unsteady.
Stall delay would happen in low freestream turbulance, single/multi-element airfoils cases. In fact, experiment also shows the stall delay or hysteresis would happen as the angle of attack increases, one degree a time to measuer the forces. See "An Experimental Investigation on Aerodynamic Hysteresis of a Low-Reynolds Number Airfoil" (you can google it for full paper), so that the last paper's CFD predition shows the trend. As you said about the pitching/plunging motion, I think it is not only happend in this unsteady motions. Anyway, I am doing the indepence study, but the mesh is too large (several millions)for a fine meshes, more time are needed to converge. |
|
June 9, 2013, 07:57 |
|
#24 |
Member
Linyx
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
I strongly suggest you to read this, which is a hysteresis in the static aerodynamic by experiment
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfvi...4&vid=2&hid=25 |
|
June 9, 2013, 08:35 |
|
#25 |
Senior Member
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 341
Rep Power: 15 |
Strongly? hahaha alright doc. I will
__________________
Lefteris |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Floating point exception error | Alan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | July 1, 2021 21:51 |
pimpleFoam: turbulence->correct(); is not executed when using residualControl | hfs | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 29, 2013 08:35 |
calculation stops after few time steps | sivakumar | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 17, 2013 06:37 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 03:34 |
Problems with simulating TurbFOAM | barath.ezhilan | OpenFOAM | 13 | July 16, 2009 05:55 |