CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

(VOF)Open channel-Turbulent flow.. what is wrong??

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 19, 2014, 15:08
Default (VOF)Open channel-Turbulent flow.. what is wrong??
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
yahmed is on a distinguished road
I am modelling 3D rectangular open channel : dimensions (2 m x 1 m x 9 m),
The channel has 192 cylindrical tubes with diameters of 25 mm and length of 1.56 m, installed in arrays modules. There is an inlet region which deliver the water
All what I know is the incoming flow rate = 0.8 m3/s
I decided to simulate half of the domain and apply symmetry to simplify the problem, since it creates a very large model with large number of elements.

The problem that it shows a reversed flow at pressure outlet and viscosity ratio exceeded limit warning messages during calculations. and I stopped the calculations to check the regions that are affected by this message. please see figures to see regions with very high velocity and viscosity ratio magnitudes.
velocityc.jpg
viscratio.jpg


I used ansys meshing tool : Cutcell assembly meshing.
In Fluent I used the following setup:

Models:
Multiphase> VOF > Open Channel Flow > Implicit
Viscous > Realizable K-e model > scalable wall functions

Phases:
primary: Air
Secondary :water

Boundaries: Boundaries.jpg
Face(1) Inlet : Velocity Inlet,
mixture : momentum > velocity ~ 0.4 m/s ( divide 0.8 m3/s by area of inlet = 2*1)
turbulence: Intensity = 1% and length scale = 0.1 (0.07* characteristic length scale I used the length of the tube which is 1.56 m)

multiphase: phase-2 - I specified free surface and bottom level such that it represents a water volume fraction of 1 at the inlet face.

Face(2) Outlet: Pressure outlet -
Normal to boundary
turbulence: Intensity = 1% and length scale = 0.1 m
-with open channel : free surface=0 and bottom level=-0.753 (the figure shows where are the origin of the coordinate system) xy.jpg

Face(3) Top : pressure outlet -without open channel selected

Face(4) Symmetry
All other faces > Walls: no slip

URF : default
Solution methods: default

I also, tried to change the inlet boundary to Mass inlet (flow rate of water = 1000 (kg/m3) *0.4(m/s) * 1 (m2)= 400 kg/s ) and for air mass flow rate=0.005 kg/s. but also I had the same problem of reversed flow and viscosity ratio.!!!

Any help please to identify causes of the problem??

Thank you..
yahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2014, 10:11
Unhappy Any body ??
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
yahmed is on a distinguished road
Please Fluent users I need your help ....
yahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2015, 17:15
Default Same problem
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
yahmed is on a distinguished road
Please I am running into this problem again now, reversed flow in the outlet and viscosity limit is exceeding. I appreciate any help please.
yahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2015, 00:55
Default
  #4
Member
 
Devesh Baghel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 17
devesh.baghel is on a distinguished road
Hi,

1. Define water as primary fluid & air is secondary fluid.
2. define all the 4 boundaries as symmetry except inlet\outlet, if flow domain is core region of tube bundles.
3. If reverse flow is happening at initial stage of simulation, no need to worry about that, let the simulation run and wait for flow field stabilization.


Devesh
devesh.baghel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2015, 03:26
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
yahmed is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by devesh.baghel View Post
Hi,

1. Define water as primary fluid & air is secondary fluid.
2. define all the 4 boundaries as symmetry except inlet\outlet, if flow domain is core region of tube bundles.
3. If reverse flow is happening at initial stage of simulation, no need to worry about that, let the simulation run and wait for flow field stabilization.


Devesh
Thank you Devesh for your reply . Finally I am getting some help I was really hopeless.. Ok I will try to run it again using your suggestions but regarding symmetry BCs, should I set the symmetry BC even for the channel walls? or you mean only the top boundary and the symmetry face?
yahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2015, 04:05
Default
  #6
Member
 
Devesh Baghel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 17
devesh.baghel is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am sorry, I thought that you are taking core\cenral zone of tube bundles but you are considering only half of core region for simulation.

1. Do you really think top surface should be pressure outlet in actual practice, if not just make it as a wall.
2. If it is really a open channel, free surafe problem......top side should be away from the core flow & should not affect the flow parameters of mixture as density of water is much more than air.
3. Velocity is shooting upto ~300 m\sec, please check the BC's, dimension of geometry and mesh density i.e. refinement.
4. Are you considering Gravity & Surface tension also into your simulation ?


Devesh
devesh.baghel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2015, 03:38
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12
yahmed is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by devesh.baghel View Post
Hi,

I am sorry, I thought that you are taking core\cenral zone of tube bundles but you are considering only half of core region for simulation.

1. Do you really think top surface should be pressure outlet in actual practice, if not just make it as a wall.
2. If it is really a open channel, free surafe problem......top side should be away from the core flow & should not affect the flow parameters of mixture as density of water is much more than air.
3. Velocity is shooting upto ~300 m\sec, please check the BC's, dimension of geometry and mesh density i.e. refinement.
4. Are you considering Gravity & Surface tension also into your simulation ?


Devesh
For testing purposes I tried to run the VOF model for the channel only without the tubes. I have tested all boundary conditions combinations, all of them didn't give realistic results or didn't converge. Only Mass inlet boundary condition with outflow BC for the outlet, along with pressure outlet BC for the top surface generated close results, but there were two problems that " reversed flow on pressure outlet" message was shown during all iterations, and the residuals were fluctuating as you see in the image.
Residuals_Min_Mout_Ptop (2).jpg

VOF_Min_Mout_Ptop.jpg

velocity_Min_Mout_Ptop.jpg

I appreciate your advice about this... it seems to be simple problem but it is not working..
Note: I repeated the simulations with different dimension to replace the top surface far from the free surface but same behavior occurred.. not sure how far should it be??
yahmed is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2016, 04:41
Default
  #8
Member
 
muhamed
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 12
Mohammad80 is on a distinguished road
Hi.
I have a problem with the reverse flow at the outlet of my geometry. I am doing a simulation to determine the water drag force on a pier inside a channel using FLUENT. I want to get the results for a Laminar flow (v=0.0001 m/sec). the simulation is going well but the drag force I got is negative, that means the reverse flow affecting on the results. I increased the elements density and I changed the geometry to be as shown in the attached picture and made the outlet far from the pier and I decreased the time step size but I still get the reverse flow warning messages. I read all the comments in this site about this problem and i did all what were suggested but unfortunately, the problem stills unsolved. Any tips please?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pier.jpg (77.1 KB, 17 views)
Mohammad80 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About Some Concepts:Laminar flow, turbulent flow, steady flow and time-dependent flow Jing Main CFD Forum 8 October 5, 2018 17:02
LES: Turbulent Channel Flow without initial solution (BC) DaSh OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 21 February 8, 2015 16:09
LES In Turbulent in channel flow pankaj saha Main CFD Forum 18 November 20, 2014 05:49
Natural convection - Inlet boundary condition max91 CFX 1 July 29, 2008 20:28
collocated grid for turbulent channel flow!! frederic felten Main CFD Forum 0 July 11, 2000 22:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:00.