CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

divergence detected in amg solver temperature increasing relaxation sweeps

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 30, 2014, 03:58
Default divergence detected in amg solver temperature increasing relaxation sweeps
  #1
New Member
 
Kashif Rashid
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 11
Kashif Rashid is on a distinguished road
Hi every body;
I am simulating heat exchanger, with fins inside & flow channel, serpentine flow, 18 passes each sides. Energy of Flue gas (N2,CO2,H2O,O2) is being used to heat the process air.

1. Flue gas entering from top at 1000 k (0.002355 kg/s) leaving at the bottom 927 k (Re# 1913, Mach# 0.06045), 20 m/s at the entrance

2. Process air entering from bottom at 300 k (0.00323 kg/s) leaving at the top 996 k (Re# ~7000, Mach# 0.146), 50 m/s at the entrance

I am using following scheme for simulation
-Energy--on
-Steady
-Laminar
-Species transport
-Pressure based solver---both tried segr. & coupled
-Tried both---Velocity inlet & Mass flow inlet
-Outlet----Pressure outlet
-Mesh---maximum skewness = 0.64

After doing all above stuff, solution is not proceeding ahead, facing errors like
# Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature -> Increasing relaxation sweeps!
# Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum -> Increasing relaxation sweeps!

I am stuck, desperately looking for help, please suggest, what should i do to get converged and reasonable solution??

I have not tried density based solver, also treating problem as a incompressible flow despite large temperature variation which might effecting the density of flue gas and process air. What is your opinion on that as well.
Thanks in advanced.
Kashif Rashid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 1, 2014, 05:07
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,665
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
This type of occurrence is common when you have material properties that are temperature dependent. You initial guesses for the temperature & velocity fields are lousy, causing them to blow up quickly. Two suggestions:

1. What equation of state are you using for each? Constant or variable properties? I would try switching all the equations of state to constant properties (density, specific heat, etc).

2. I would also disable the energy equation entirely, and run a constant density simulation to get a reasonable fluid flow solution.

Try to see if the problem still diverges when you try both of these. Basically you're testing to see if the solution advances at all by removing the hard stuff. If it works then you can slowly add the complexities back into the problem.
Kashif Rashid likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2014, 03:56
Default 2-D double wedge in hypersonic flow
  #3
New Member
 
Subhasree
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: IIT Bombay, India
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 12
Subhasree is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I am modeling a 2-D wedge in hyper-sonic flow having the following free-stream conditions:
Mach no-9.59
Temperature-185.6k
Pressure-36.5Pa
I have used the following setup in fluent post:
Desity based
fluid-Ideal gas
standard initialization from farfield
I tried running the 1000 iterations initially...in which the continuity and energy equations are hardly changing while the x velocity is having a negative slope(convergence), the y velocity is having a positive slope(divergence)..i having tried reducing the cfl value...it is showing the same trend as I increase the number of Iteration.....I have attached snap shots of the mesh and residual plot.
plz suggest!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg residual.jpg (44.3 KB, 34 views)
File Type: jpg mesh.jpg (75.5 KB, 30 views)
Subhasree is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2014, 06:23
Default Heat Exchanger Simulation_Not getting desired solution
  #4
New Member
 
Kashif Rashid
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 11
Kashif Rashid is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
This type of occurrence is common when you have material properties that are temperature dependent. You initial guesses for the temperature & velocity fields are lousy, causing them to blow up quickly. Two suggestions:

1. What equation of state are you using for each? Constant or variable properties? I would try switching all the equations of state to constant properties (density, specific heat, etc).

2. I would also disable the energy equation entirely, and run a constant density simulation to get a reasonable fluid flow solution.

Try to see if the problem still diverges when you try both of these. Basically you're testing to see if the solution advances at all by removing the hard stuff. If it works then you can slowly add the complexities back into the problem.
As you directed, i started with simplest one, adding complexity bit by bit. I have reached to a converged solution. But this converged solution, not fulfilling my requirements, giving reasonable value of air heating, not good for flue gas temperature variation. I have attached my work, mesh, simulated temp. contours, experimental setup with required values. Temp. variations are exist after simulation but not shown by temp. contours.
Secondly, if i put zero heat flux on the outer and inner walls, solution converged quickly, but when i specify some temp. on the walls it didn't come to convergence, iteration going on and on.
I am looking for help to get desired solution. Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mesh.jpg (50.0 KB, 42 views)
File Type: jpg Simulation_Results_Solver_Settings.jpg (51.1 KB, 37 views)
File Type: jpg Temperature_Contours.jpg (45.9 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg Experimental_Setup.jpg (89.7 KB, 33 views)
Kashif Rashid is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with divergence TDK FLUENT 13 December 14, 2018 06:00
Divergence problem Smaras FLUENT 13 February 21, 2013 05:03
Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum arashm FLOW-3D 2 August 14, 2010 04:54
user subroutine error CFDUSER CFX 2 December 9, 2006 06:31
user defined function cfduser CFX 0 April 29, 2006 10:58


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41.