|
[Sponsors] |
is there any way to don't mesh e a solid part in conuction ? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 26, 2014, 11:31 |
is there any way to don't mesh e a solid part in conuction ?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
hi everyone
i'm silulation an U-pipe which containing a fluid and both of them are in the soil. so there is three part (2 solids and a fluid) the pipe has a small thickness. is there anyway to don't mesh the pipe and only assume it's conduction is ansys fluent ? i try to use shell conduction but because of conjugate heat transfer i couldn't use that . is there anyway else ? thanks |
|
December 27, 2014, 15:56 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
no idea ?
|
|
December 28, 2014, 10:45 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
Your question is grammatically hard to understand, maybe that's why you got no answer. If I understood well, I think you can define a wall thickness, make sure the wall material is set to the pipe material. |
|
December 28, 2014, 13:04 |
|
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
i want to simulate a geothermal u-pipe there is pipe which containing a fluid and they place in the soil vertically when i ignore the pipe body and only assume the fluid and the soil, process will converge after under about 180 itrate per time step but when i draw u-pipe body and mesh it, process does't converge even after 10000 iterate per time step . i don' know what's the reason ? so i decided to use shell conduction for a u-pipe and and doesn't solve it and only assume it's conduction. but when i use the shell conduction conjugate heat transfer between the water and soil doesn't occure ( i give a heat flux to the outer wall of soil . the conduction in the soil occur but the convection in the water doesn't occur !) i can't use the interface boundry condition in the walls of the water and soil because then i couldn't use the shell condoction for those walls could you help me about this ? |
||
December 29, 2014, 22:42 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
Did you try the simpler thin wall/thermal resistance approach? No need to geometry/mesh the pipe thickness with this approach. https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...l_outside_temp
|
|
December 30, 2014, 10:20 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
could you explain more about this ? but i think it's conduction is in 1 direction only . is it right ? |
||
December 30, 2014, 10:48 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two-sided Wall Heat Transfer BC - No Separate Solid Mesh and No Heat Transfer Coeff | swahono | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | October 15, 2018 05:43 |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 03:19 |
[ICEM] extrude surface mesh for solid wall | Daniel_Khazaei | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 13 | May 29, 2014 09:25 |
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors | DarrenC | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 11 | August 5, 2013 06:42 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 14:09 |