CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

is there any way to don't mesh e a solid part in conuction ?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 26, 2014, 11:31
Question is there any way to don't mesh e a solid part in conuction ?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11
reza67 is on a distinguished road
hi everyone
i'm silulation an U-pipe which containing a fluid and both of them are in the soil. so there is three part (2 solids and a fluid)

the pipe has a small thickness. is there anyway to don't mesh the pipe and only assume it's conduction is ansys fluent ?
i try to use shell conduction but because of conjugate heat transfer i couldn't use that . is there anyway else ?

thanks
reza67 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2014, 15:56
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11
reza67 is on a distinguished road
no idea ?
reza67 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2014, 10:45
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17
macfly is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Your question is grammatically hard to understand, maybe that's why you got no answer.

If I understood well, I think you can define a wall thickness, make sure the wall material is set to the pipe material.
macfly is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2014, 13:04
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11
reza67 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by macfly View Post
Hi,

Your question is grammatically hard to understand, maybe that's why you got no answer.

If I understood well, I think you can define a wall thickness, make sure the wall material is set to the pipe material.
thanks for your answer macfly .
i want to simulate a geothermal u-pipe
there is pipe which containing a fluid and they place in the soil vertically
when i ignore the pipe body and only assume the fluid and the soil, process will converge after under about 180 itrate per time step but when i draw u-pipe body and mesh it, process does't converge even after 10000 iterate per time step . i don' know what's the reason ?
so i decided to use shell conduction for a u-pipe and and doesn't solve it and only assume it's conduction. but when i use the shell conduction conjugate heat transfer between the water and soil doesn't occure ( i give a heat flux to the outer wall of soil . the conduction in the soil occur but the convection in the water doesn't occur !) i can't use the interface boundry condition in the walls of the water and soil because then i couldn't use the shell condoction for those walls

could you help me about this ?
reza67 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2014, 22:42
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17
macfly is on a distinguished road
Did you try the simpler thin wall/thermal resistance approach? No need to geometry/mesh the pipe thickness with this approach. https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...l_outside_temp
macfly is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2014, 10:20
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 11
reza67 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by macfly View Post
Did you try the simpler thin wall/thermal resistance approach? No need to geometry/mesh the pipe thickness with this approach. https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...l_outside_temp
thanks macfly
could you explain more about this ?
but i think it's conduction is in 1 direction only . is it right ?
reza67 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2014, 10:48
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17
macfly is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by reza67 View Post
could you explain more about this ?
but i think it's conduction is in 1 direction only . is it right ?
I can't explain it better than the User's Guide or any other text you can find in a basic heat transfer book. http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~allan...ge5/page5.html
macfly is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two-sided Wall Heat Transfer BC - No Separate Solid Mesh and No Heat Transfer Coeff swahono OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 October 15, 2018 05:43
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 03:19
[ICEM] extrude surface mesh for solid wall Daniel_Khazaei ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 13 May 29, 2014 09:25
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors DarrenC ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 August 5, 2013 06:42
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 14:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:33.