|
[Sponsors] |
December 9, 2014, 08:35 |
Spalart-Almaras wall function
|
#1 |
New Member
Federico
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Rome
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi guys,
I'm studying a flow over an airfoil characterized by 10^6 Reynolds value. I'd like to ask you something about the Spalart-Almaras model, because I' ve red on the Guide that in FLUENT this model works with an Enhanced wall treatment. If I understood well, this treatment allows you to make a less dense mesh, with a Yplus value higher than 30, modelling in a certain way the viscous and the buffer layers. Is it correct? I've made a mesh with a Yplus of 65, cause i need a not so heavy mesh. Could the model work good for this kind of mesh? Thanks ! |
|
December 11, 2014, 10:06 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
B_Kia
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ir
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello,
This model works automatically, so based on your y-plus the model works good, for this model y-plus should be under 1 or more than 30 , if y-plus<1 then the enhanced wall treatment will be activated and if y-plus>30 the standard wall function will be activated automatically. good luck |
|
December 12, 2014, 15:40 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Federico
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Rome
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Ok, i've done some simulation with this condition, is it good to apply the ADAPT function on the Yplus, imposing the max value allowed around 3 ? Do you think the Spalart Almaras would give better results with this correction? or is it unnecessary? (I' ve done both the simulation with and without the correction, but it seems to give pretty same value of Cl) |
||
December 12, 2014, 18:17 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Federico
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Rome
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Ok, i should correct myself, i'm having a convergence problem with angle of attack at 10° with the non adapted mesh, still haven't done the tries with an adapted one.
|
|
December 13, 2014, 08:51 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
B_Kia
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ir
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 11 |
hi,
if you want SA model workes as a low reynolds number y-plus around 1 is better, but i think 3 is also ok, good luck |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
foamToTecplot360 | thomasduerr | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 121 | June 11, 2021 10:05 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment | paduchev | FLUENT | 24 | January 8, 2018 11:55 |
[blockMesh] Errors during blockMesh meshing | Madeleine P. Vincent | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 51 | May 30, 2016 10:51 |
Radiation interface | hinca | CFX | 15 | January 26, 2014 17:11 |
is internalField(U) equivalent to zeroGradient? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 29, 2013 01:27 |