CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

FLUENT: Pure Conduction???

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 24, 2015, 10:13
Question FLUENT: Pure Conduction???
  #1
Member
 
Anh
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 7
dinhanh is on a distinguished road
I am doing the pure conduction by Fluent. The calculation domain is as in the picture below. It include: core region (UO2) which is covered by Tank. All material are air.
The border wall outside is convective boundary condition.
The material of core is UO2, and the condition for this core is Heat generation Rate 8000w/m3.
The wall of Tank is Al.

So in Fluent, I specify the the Heat Generation Rate for the core region in the tap: Cell Zone Condition - Source tap. For the wall boundary of the core and Tank, It is the coupled wall condition.
The solve is only Energy equation (No flow).

But the solution give the temperature of core reach to maximum limit of temperature: 10000K. This results is inaccurate, analysis results is about 3000K.
I think the error may be caused by wrong boundary condition.

Could you please give the comment about this problem?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Untitled.jpg (20.8 KB, 17 views)
dinhanh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2015, 18:56
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 3,575
Rep Power: 44
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
What's your viscous model? Is it inviscid?

I've had problems simulating pure conduction with inviscid model, have to select laminar or turbulent.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2015, 17:34
Default
  #3
jsm
Senior Member
 
JSM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: India
Posts: 168
Rep Power: 15
jsm is on a distinguished road
Hi,

If you defined the source term for volume, then no need to specify the source in walls also. By defining like this, you are applying double the time of source in your simulation.

Remove the source in the walls and rerun it. It might be the one of the reason for more temperature in the domain.
__________________
With regards,
JSM
jsm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2015, 07:01
Default
  #4
Member
 
Anh
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 7
dinhanh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
What's your viscous model? Is it inviscid?

I've had problems simulating pure conduction with inviscid model, have to select laminar or turbulent.
Thank you, LuckyTran.
I already selected laminar calculation.
dinhanh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2015, 07:05
Default
  #5
Member
 
Anh
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 7
dinhanh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsm View Post
Hi,

If you defined the source term for volume, then no need to specify the source in walls also. By defining like this, you are applying double the time of source in your simulation.

Remove the source in the walls and rerun it. It might be the one of the reason for more temperature in the domain.
Thank you, jsm.
Actually, I did not specify the source in walls. The boundary for the wall is coupled wall (which are used when that wall is between two different material).
Fluent have one tutorial similar (heat generation on the chip), but the different is that have flow instead of pure conduction. My case is pure conduction. So It may be the problems?
dinhanh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2015, 11:11
Default
  #6
jsm
Senior Member
 
JSM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: India
Posts: 168
Rep Power: 15
jsm is on a distinguished road
Then, I don't know the reason for high temperature.

If solution is converged and there is no issues in case setup, there might be other reasons.

1. Double check the volume of zone in Fluent and input source value (8000 W/m3)
2. Check the modeling
3. Incorrect energy value in Watts
__________________
With regards,
JSM
jsm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2015, 06:01
Default
  #7
Member
 
Anh
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 7
dinhanh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsm View Post
Then, I don't know the reason for high temperature.

If solution is converged and there is no issues in case setup, there might be other reasons.

1. Double check the volume of zone in Fluent and input source value (8000 W/m3)
2. Check the modeling
3. Incorrect energy value in Watts
I checked all comments of you. It is Ok. I dont what probelm is.
I upload the full domain of my calculation as in the picture below. Maybe you can understand my situation better.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg heat-job-1.4-flow.jpg (37.8 KB, 10 views)
dinhanh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2015, 14:32
Default
  #8
jsm
Senior Member
 
JSM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: India
Posts: 168
Rep Power: 15
jsm is on a distinguished road
What is "Heat source 44 m3". Even if is heat source volume then, 44 m3 is huge. Is your domain really than much big in size. Also check the properties of solids.

other than this, I don't know the reason for high temperature.
__________________
With regards,
JSM
jsm is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two questions on Fluent UDF Steven Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 7 March 23, 2018 04:22
looking for a smart interface matlab fluent chary FLUENT 20 November 6, 2017 10:12
Abaqus - Fluent Coupling WITHOUT MPCCI s.mishra FLUENT 1 April 5, 2016 07:47
Master node in parallel computing only distirubtion syadgar FLUENT 1 September 8, 2009 17:41
Anistropic thermal conduction in Fluent 6.2 Bharath FLUENT 0 November 23, 2006 22:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22.