# Mixed convection with large Buoyancy force - cannot converge

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 4, 2015, 07:42 Mixed convection with large Buoyancy force - cannot converge #1 New Member   Guang Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Stuttgart, Germany Posts: 15 Rep Power: 11 Hi i am simulating the flow and heat transfer in a rectangular cavity, i want to get the temperature distribution in the steady state. It's size is 6m(length)*10m(width)*8m(height), the top surface (6m*10m) is considered as velocity inlet with constant and uniform velocity and temperature of V = 0.023m/s and T = 137 K, the four side walls are considered as constant and uniform temperature of Tw =177K. The outlet is located at the bottom of the cavity. Nitrogen is considered as the working fluid, and the boussinesq approximation for density is used. Due to symmetry, i modeled 1/4 of the cavity. The grid size is tested to get the Y+ between about 30 and 70. The Reynolds number and Grashof number for the above condition is calculated as about 10^4 and 10^14, respectively. RNG-ke model is used for turbulence. "Standard wall functions" is used for near wall treatment. Under the above boundary conditions, i can get the converged solution, as the residual for all variables decrease to less than 10^-4. Then i want to get the results for other inlet velocities, but i cannot get the correct results. 1. When i increase the inlet velocity to 2V or even higher, the residuals keep fluctuating at the level about 10^-1, and no converged solution can be get. I tried to increase the grid number, but it still does not work. 2. I decreased the inlet velocity to V/2, i can get the converged solution. But the results are obviously not correct, as the results show the average temperature in the cavity becomes a little smaller. This problem has confused me for a few weeks, as each calculation lasts for 2 days. i don't know if the models and procedure i used for such parameters are correct, or the problem itself is not stable? please give me some advise if you can help. Thanks a lot.

 January 19, 2017, 10:38 #2 New Member   Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 4 Rep Power: 9 I think the CFL number is too high when you increase your velocity to 2V. Try to change the time step and the mesh size to keep CFL number below 1.

January 19, 2017, 11:57
#3
Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 18
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jefferson2010 I think the CFL number is too high when you increase your velocity to 2V. Try to change the time step and the mesh size to keep CFL number below 1.
The post was made an year ago.

 Tags buoyancy, converge, mixed convection, natural convection, temperature

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post deji OpenFOAM 15 November 29, 2020 08:59 faycal2013 FLUENT 1 December 27, 2013 12:43 champshof CFX 4 November 18, 2009 03:07 john Main CFD Forum 1 May 23, 2007 02:27 arsei0707 Phoenics 1 December 14, 2005 05:11

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top