CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Mixed convection with large Buoyancy force - cannot converge

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 4, 2015, 08:42
Question Mixed convection with large Buoyancy force - cannot converge
  #1
New Member
 
Guang
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6
stardust111 is on a distinguished road
Hi
i am simulating the flow and heat transfer in a rectangular cavity, i want to get the temperature distribution in the steady state.
It's size is 6m(length)*10m(width)*8m(height), the top surface (6m*10m) is considered as velocity inlet with constant and uniform velocity and temperature of V = 0.023m/s and T = 137 K, the four side walls are considered as constant and uniform temperature of Tw =177K. The outlet is located at the bottom of the cavity. Nitrogen is considered as the working fluid, and the boussinesq approximation for density is used.
Due to symmetry, i modeled 1/4 of the cavity. The grid size is tested to get the Y+ between about 30 and 70.
The Reynolds number and Grashof number for the above condition is calculated as about 10^4 and 10^14, respectively. RNG-ke model is used for turbulence. "Standard wall functions" is used for near wall treatment.
Under the above boundary conditions, i can get the converged solution, as the residual for all variables decrease to less than 10^-4.
Then i want to get the results for other inlet velocities, but i cannot get the correct results.
1. When i increase the inlet velocity to 2V or even higher, the residuals keep fluctuating at the level about 10^-1, and no converged solution can be get.
I tried to increase the grid number, but it still does not work.
2. I decreased the inlet velocity to V/2, i can get the converged solution. But the results are obviously not correct, as the results show the average temperature in the cavity becomes a little smaller.
This problem has confused me for a few weeks, as each calculation lasts for 2 days. i don't know if the models and procedure i used for such parameters are correct, or the problem itself is not stable?
please give me some advise if you can help. Thanks a lot.
stardust111 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2017, 11:38
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4
Jefferson2010 is on a distinguished road
I think the CFL number is too high when you increase your velocity to 2V. Try to change the time step and the mesh size to keep CFL number below 1.
Jefferson2010 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2017, 12:57
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 483
Rep Power: 13
Antanas is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson2010 View Post
I think the CFL number is too high when you increase your velocity to 2V. Try to change the time step and the mesh size to keep CFL number below 1.
The post was made an year ago.
Antanas is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
buoyancy, converge, mixed convection, natural convection, temperature

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mixed Convection Turbulent Boundary Layer Problem deji OpenFOAM 14 May 29, 2014 10:51
Any tutorial about mixed convection? faycal2013 FLUENT 1 December 27, 2013 13:43
Force by buoyancy champshof CFX 4 November 18, 2009 04:07
Large varying body force vs. Rhie-chow correction john Main CFD Forum 1 May 23, 2007 03:27
buoyancy force due to concentration difference arsei0707 Phoenics 1 December 14, 2005 06:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38.