|
[Sponsors] |
March 31, 2015, 07:50 |
To consider gravity or not ?
|
#1 |
Member
prince
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 14 |
I have a vertical channel. From the bottom (say y=0) Deuterium and Oxygen gas flows inside the channel (D2-0.2 & O2-0.8 mass fraction) and from side inlet somewhere near the top (say at 4.12) helium gas enters into the domain. total length of domain is 4.7m
Velocity range for helium gas(He) is 0.12 m/s for D2&O2 is in order of 10^-6 m/s I have given mass diffsivity of each gases into mixture template in material section of fluent. i am using incompressible ideal gas equation for density estimation. Here is my doubt.. Should i consider gravity in my problem ? Flow is upward Temperature remains same and there is no heat source. so desnity variation is not a concern. But density of D2&He is much lower than the O2. How to take that into account. Any help is much appreciated. I have stuck to this problem for a long time. |
|
March 31, 2015, 08:30 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 26 |
Quote:
|
||
April 1, 2015, 00:54 |
|
#3 |
Member
prince
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks for the reply.
Well, i did try that trick. Only problem is without gravity my solution converges nicely and results can be explained with logics. But with gravity on, results are not as expected. and it gives me some convergence problem. Though i think gravity should be considered in my problem as lighter gas should rise above the heavier gas. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simpleFoam with gravity, based on interFoam | JonW | OpenFOAM | 1 | May 9, 2019 10:08 |
Convergence problem when use gravity | aroma | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | April 10, 2013 10:18 |
Ok to increase gravity gradually from 0 to 9.82? | Admo | FLUENT | 3 | February 23, 2012 10:43 |
UDF fails to model 9.81m/s^2 gravity | jpo | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 2 | January 24, 2012 18:15 |
how to consider gravity in CFX | shrimp | CFX | 4 | September 8, 2008 20:41 |