CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Nusselt and friction factor validation in turbulent flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran
  • 1 Post By buidu

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 27, 2015, 15:52
Unhappy Nusselt and friction factor validation in turbulent flow
  #1
New Member
 
Mehdi
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
me.po is on a distinguished road
Hi
I've tried to simulate a classical problem of flow and heat transfer in a circular tube with constant heat flux, radius of 10mm and 60mm length. I've used the periodic boundary condition, K-epsilon model with st. wall function and the Reynolds number between 10000 to 40000. When I use the finer mesh, the friction factor and Nusselt increase drastically and get distance from the analytical results . This problem is more serious for low Reynolds (10000<Re<20000). I've checked several grids from 22000 to 1 billion cells, both fine and coarse, with boundary layer mesh (first layer at 10-6 m and I've also used adaption. I've even solved the problem with non-periodic condition and fully developed profile but the problem still remains. I checked the mesh with laminar velocities (and laminar model) and the results were consistent with analytical results (less than 3% error).
Please guide me to solve this problem.
me.po is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 27, 2015, 21:08
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,666
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
This is exactly why validation & mesh sensitivity studies are always necessary.

Most likely a mesh quality problem. If your grid was automatically generated, it's probably related to increased grid skewness when you went to the finer grid.
me.po likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2015, 02:23
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Mehdi
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
me.po is on a distinguished road
Thanks,
What's your suggestion???
me.po is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2015, 03:11
Default
  #4
New Member
 
buidu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 12
buidu is on a distinguished road
The turbulence intensity may have influence on the convective coefficient. The empirical equations are on the assumption that TI is very low. You can find it on textbook. From you simulation, you can also notice it.
Perhaps you can try to run your case on lower TI.
me.po likes this.
buidu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2015, 04:48
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Mehdi
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
me.po is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by buidu View Post
The turbulence intensity may have influence on the convective coefficient. The empirical equations are on the assumption that TI is very low. You can find it on textbook. From you simulation, you can also notice it.
Perhaps you can try to run your case on lower TI.
Thank you for your advice,
Yes, it's too high. My turbulence intensity is Min 50% (at core region) and Max 91% (at wall). How can I control TI in periodic domain?
me.po is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2015, 12:11
Default
  #6
New Member
 
buidu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 12
buidu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by me.po View Post
Thank you for your advice,
Yes, it's too high. My turbulence intensity is Min 50% (at core region) and Max 91% (at wall). How can I control TI in periodic domain?
You can control your TI in the setting of inlet.

Regards
buidu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2015, 12:42
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Mehdi
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
me.po is on a distinguished road
But that wasn't the cause of the error. when you use periodic conditions, there is no longer any inlet or outlet and flow is fully developed. I checked the problem with finer mesh with very good quality and the problem still remains!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
me.po is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2023, 03:16
Default did this problem is solved?
  #8
New Member
 
Vaibhav Hiwale
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: India
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4
vaibhavhiwale is on a distinguished road
Did this problem is solved? im also facing the same problem
vaibhavhiwale is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
caculation of friction factor Dilip Main CFD Forum 9 February 23, 2016 05:00
Calculation of Friction Factor & Nusselt Number mypassion59 FLUENT 1 July 9, 2014 14:31
Getting (Nusselt vs Re) & (friction vs Re) in a ribbed duct shayan_mv FLUENT 6 November 14, 2012 03:42
Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar flow Danro Siemens 8 July 19, 2012 07:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:05.