CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Refracting/Bending at semitransparent external wall (Radiation modelling)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 7, 2016, 07:56
Default Refracting/Bending at semitransparent external wall (Radiation modelling)
  #1
New Member
 
Christoph Ferk
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 8
chrisf90 is on a distinguished road
First of all: Hi everybody as this is my first post in this forum.
I'm working with Fluent for about 2 months so I'm defently a newbie but a lot of answered questions in this forum makes the "getting started" process much more efficient. Thank you for that.

So to my problem: I am trying to simulate air flow and heat transfer in a double skin facade (DSF). This is a facade where a second layer (made out of glaz) is placed up to 1 or even 2 metres in front of the conventional facade. The outer layer has openings for air in- and outlet. When solar radiation passes the outer single glazing it is absorbed by the shading device which is located in the facades cavity. This is way the temperature of the air increases in the cavity and natural convection occurs.

I have attached a sketch of my problem's geometry. The boundary conditions are:
B1 pressure inlet 303K
B2 outlet
B3 semitransparent exterior wall with solar heat flux 1000W/mē
B4 adiabatic
B5 mixed thermal B.C. 298K for external radiation and 7.7 W/mēK for convection

The question which I am facing is: Why is the solar radiation flux at boundary B3 bent (refracted)? See attachment2. I want the radiation radiate orthogonally to B3 until it hits a solid in the domain or a external boundary. I am worried about that because there a regions (at the top of double glazing) where no solar radiation is adjacent.

In Fluent Theory Guide (chapter 5.3.6.7.5.) it says that the wall should have zero thickness and a non-zero absorption coefficient. So I modeled it with A=0.01 [1/m] because I don't want to calm down the intensity through the boundary. The refractive index of wall B3 is set to 1 as i don't want reflection back from B3. In Figure 5.12 in Theory Guide it also says that the refractive indices of outside the domain and the adjacent solid or fluid zone after the external wall should not be equal. Has anybody an explanation why?

But ok, as it says in Users Guide (chapter 13.3.7.3.2.) that the refractive index of outside the domain is assumed to be 1 I modeled n of air with 1,01.
I also tried it with both fixed to 1 and the solution was the same.

By the way:
Are there better opportunities to model solar radiation in 2D problems? As solar ray tracing (including solar load model) is only available in 3D, nothing better came to my mind than modelling as I did.

I would appreciate any advice and have to say sorry for my long introduction to my problem.

Cheers Chris
Attached Images
File Type: jpg GeometryBC.jpg (38.3 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg Radiation_Band0.JPG (38.9 KB, 15 views)
chrisf90 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Centrifugal fan j0hnny CFX 13 October 1, 2019 14:55
Fluent Radiation/porous media Schmitt pierre-Louis FLUENT 26 September 1, 2016 11:29
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 07:20
Cluster ID's not contiguous in compute-nodes domain. ??? Shogan FLUENT 1 May 28, 2014 16:03
Questions about radiation modelling Yingchun CFX 5 November 23, 2005 02:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:45.