CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Negative Volume Problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By -mAx-

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 29, 2016, 04:07
Default Negative Volume Problem
  #1
New Member
 
Pakistan/Punjab
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10
mueen is on a distinguished road
I'm having problem of negative cell volume detected! in a quad mesh of two concentric cylinders in Fluent for 2D dynamic meshing case. I did meshing of cylinders in Gambit and then export it to Fluent solver [Gambit]. The JPEG images are attached which shows the volume of dynamic mesh before and after the error detected..
Can u plz help me in this regard.
Thank u!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.JPG (25.2 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg 2.JPG (13.2 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg 3.JPG (24.4 KB, 21 views)
mueen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 29, 2016, 04:24
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
I assume, if you were able to export your mesh in Fluent, then you didn't have any cell with negative volume (else the export would fail).
Then your problem lies on your dynamic mesh setting.
If you are handling quad mesh, then I suppose you are using cell layering.
If everything is well set, you should try to reduce your dt.
this tutorial may help you:
http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue...tg/node181.htm
mueen likes this.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 29, 2016, 05:40
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Pakistan/Punjab
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10
mueen is on a distinguished road
Sir I'm using smoothing in dynamic meshing, I reduced time step size from 0.01 to 0.0001 but again after some time same error occurred.
mueen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 29, 2016, 06:19
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
no idea with smoothing, sorry.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2016, 01:17
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Pakistan/Punjab
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10
mueen is on a distinguished road
Sir I'm using UDF in along with dyanamic meshing. Is it possible that Udf is incorrect?
mueen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2016, 04:15
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
then check your motion without udf.
If you don't have cells with negative cells, then it should lie on your udf
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider

Last edited by -mAx-; March 2, 2016 at 01:17.
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2016, 12:58
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Pakistan/Punjab
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10
mueen is on a distinguished road
Sir, I've used UDF for different grid sizes along with different domain size but with same UDF I got results for only one of those grid sizes with no error & other grid sizes produce error.
mueen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2016, 19:56
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Edoardo
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
edd313 is on a distinguished road
Which smoothing tecnique are you using?
Say you are using spring-based, you may try to increase the "number of iterations". It will be more time consuming to update the mesh, but you will get better quality and eventually no negative volume.
edd313 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2016, 01:14
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Pakistan/Punjab
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10
mueen is on a distinguished road
yes sir I'm using spring based smoothing but after a few number of iterations it shows error of negative volume!!!
Should I use different smoothing technique???
mueen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2016, 02:27
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0
CeesH is on a distinguished road
are all parts of your domain moving properly?
for example, I long ago did a falling ball simulation with 6DOF, and although the ball was moving properly, the cells in front and before the ball did not remesh along, meaning the cells in front of the ball would soon overlap with the ball itself - leading to negative cell volumes.

You can see in 'preview mesh movement' where it goes wrong, typically.
CeesH is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2016, 03:34
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Pakistan/Punjab
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10
mueen is on a distinguished road
Sir, can I use TUI for smoothing of quad elements in 2d, as suggested by one of the member of CFD forum!
if yes; can u guide me how to write TUI.
mueen is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
multiphaseEulerFoam (OF2.3.0) : Courant number explodes when running in parallel Mehrez OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 May 18, 2016 11:44
Negative Volume during Mesh Motion Analysis giov_ingr FLUENT 2 December 13, 2013 06:09
Problem of negative volume Anam ANSYS 0 September 11, 2011 04:27
[ICEM] negative mesh volume problem (icem-cfd/cfx) adam2008 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 April 16, 2010 12:21
Negative volume problem in Two-way FSI coupling fred CFX 3 August 16, 2006 10:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20.