|
[Sponsors] |
April 13, 2016, 14:36 |
OH wall reaction
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 10 |
So I know there is the possibility for diffusion modelling.
Also accompanied by chemical reactions but is it possible to tell fluent that OH gets lost when hitting the wall? I want to see how the OH distribution evolves when traveling along a duct. PS: I saw the "wall surface" option under volumetric but I'm not quite sure how I can tell fluent my desires?! |
|
April 14, 2016, 05:34 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 10 |
Has anyone an idea how to incorporate wall losses of a species?!?:-(
Last edited by Diger; April 14, 2016 at 09:08. |
|
April 17, 2016, 17:09 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 10 |
Ok, so since theres not answer yet I'm trying to answer more specifically.
Atm I'm in the Create/Edit Material for mixture panel and then reaction->edit... Here I can specify some stuff in particular the wall surface reactions, but what precisely does the "rate exponent" stand for? is it the exponent of some reaction rate in this sense? k_AB*[A]^(rate exponent of A)*[B]^(rate exponent of B) which is usually 1? PS: Maybe as a side question: when would a rate exponent of a product sepcies in the forward direction be not equal zero?!? |
|
April 18, 2016, 14:04 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,673
Rep Power: 65 |
Quote:
Would you consider this an example? Irreversible, non-linear reactions can have non-zero exponents if the same species is both a reactant and a product. An example is a self-catalytic reactions. Rate equations are generally approached from a macroscopic approach, which are dominated by diffusion. If you go with a microscopic approach, which is dominated by collisions you can get more of these product dependent forward reactions. A lot of self-assembly methods fall into this category. The question is whether you follow an approach based on convention or a phenomenological approach. Do you consider rate laws as precisely defined and natural reactions must be categorized into one of these definitions or whether natural reactions are absolute and that rate laws are merely ways of describing these natural reactions. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Divergence in AMG solver! | marina | FLUENT | 20 | August 1, 2020 11:30 |
Very technical question about solving wall boundary layer ... | jlb001 | FLUENT | 6 | December 27, 2014 05:56 |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 17:30 |
Radiation interface | hinca | CFX | 15 | January 26, 2014 17:11 |
UDF for wall slipping | HFLUENT | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | April 27, 2011 12:03 |