CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

error with smaller timestep ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 8, 2016, 13:02
Default error with smaller timestep ?
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 10
Thomas MADELEINE is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody,

I have some issues with one of my simulation with fluent.

I run a transient simulation of a tank, half-filled with liquid (other half is gas)

I use VOF model with geo-reconstruct method
K-epsilon turbulence model
pressure velocity coupled (try also with SIMPLE, PISO and SIMPLEC but didn't help)
second order for turbulence energy
no inlet nor outlet
some gravity to maintain the liquide down.

I run this case for some timestep (10 ts, 1ms each) with no problem.

After that I want to see what happens in quite a instant time so I run one more timestep but with a value of 1e-7.

it converges quite well (max is 1e-8) and everythings look good except the static pressure which went quite strange... (pressure gradient doesn't only depend on the gravity but create a bulb, some points with high or low values appear too).

Moreover the shorter the timestep is, the smaller the difference should be between two timestep... I would think but this is clearly not the case here...

I don't understand why since I have tried with bigger timestep and this effect is much more damped and become null with timestep close to the initialisation value.

In fact it seems that I can repeat this error and it clearly depends on my timestep value (shorter timestep means bigger deformation).
also this error is quite converged : it is the same with another try and/or with more/less iteration (so not random value).

If somebody has any idea, he or she will make my day.

thanks in advance,

Thomas MADELEINE is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
why interPhaseChangeFoam has much smaller timestep than interFoam? gaza OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 May 18, 2015 09:16
Repeat last timestep with a smaller deltaT for guaranteed accuracy hajott OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 October 1, 2014 08:31
Timestep and Pressure Correction Relationship in SIMPLE rks171 Main CFD Forum 23 May 4, 2012 01:04
smaller timestep leads not to converge vovogoal CFX 5 October 17, 2011 09:10
IcoFsiFoam simulation crashes when using a smaller timestep mathieu OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 May 17, 2009 03:54

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:38.