|
[Sponsors] |
Problem in defining interior boundary condition |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 18, 2017, 08:11 |
Problem in defining interior boundary condition
|
#1 |
New Member
Dionysis
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to run a simulation of an airflow through a greenhouse for my thesis. I have designed a cube in Inventor with two separate faces (split) acting as windows. Then I imported the geometry to Design Modeller and enclosed it to a flow domain. Then I also created a surface from the face for each of the windows. When I move to Fluent, the windows are recognised as interfaces and I can't change them to interior, so air can flow through. Both the domain and the cube have fluid cell zones. I'm new to fluent, any suggestions? Kind Regards |
|
January 18, 2017, 08:18 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Kushal Puri
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 12 |
Your mesh is conformal or non conformal ?
|
|
January 18, 2017, 08:26 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Dionysis
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
At this point, I haven't given any attention to the mesh. I just generate a mesh and move to fluent to see if everything works.
|
|
January 19, 2017, 06:53 |
|
#4 |
Member
Obi
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 9 |
What's the purpose of the outer bounding box?
Sent from my SM-G935W8 using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
|
January 19, 2017, 07:16 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Dionysis
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
it's a domain flow where all the external conditions are going to be set (wind speed, temperature, humidity, radiation etc.).
The problem solved by making one multi-body! |
|
January 19, 2017, 08:05 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Kushal Puri
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 12 |
||
January 19, 2017, 09:28 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 26 |
Quote:
But I don't understand why that is a problem... You now replaced it by one multi-body, effectively making everything the same cell zone. That is, physically, exactly the same thing as two cell zones connected with an interface. Gas can flow through an interface, I hope you knew that... |
|
January 19, 2017, 14:47 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
Dionysis
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
So, interior and interface are the same? |
||
January 19, 2017, 18:37 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65 |
Quote:
You need a single cell-zone to use an interior boundary condition. Merge your two zones into one zone. Last edited by LuckyTran; January 20, 2017 at 03:42. |
||
January 20, 2017, 02:42 |
|
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,965
Rep Power: 26 |
Quote:
What I say is that having two cell zones connected by an interface is physically the same as having one cell zone. (If you don't apply jump conditions, and set the conditions for both cell zones the same). If you connect two parts already in the mesher, you will get one cell zone (one "interior"). If you connect them after you mesh, you will get two cell zones (two "interiors") and one interface. |
||
January 20, 2017, 03:40 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Dionysis
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
OK, thanks everyone for the quick response.
I'll practice and try both ways! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDS problem with wall boundary condition | Alex F. | FLUENT | 15 | September 21, 2015 09:28 |
[Q] Inintial condition in multiphase, multicomponent problem. | Whitebear | CFX | 4 | May 14, 2015 00:06 |
Problem with the cyclic condition | bargiola | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | May 12, 2015 13:00 |
Problem with the cyclic condition | bargiola | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 11, 2015 09:55 |
problem of implementing a new solver with a special boundary condition | huyidao | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | April 27, 2015 08:24 |