CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Light Reflection Analysis

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 13, 2017, 07:13
Question Light Reflection Analysis
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10
Neo_Zeo is on a distinguished road
Hello!
I must perform a light reflector analysis and I wonder if is it possible to do it through a fluent radiation study... or do you think it would be more interesting the use of Maxwell or Ansys Mechanical?

Thank you very much!
Neo_Zeo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2017, 22:16
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Woah those are three very different modelling packages. What physical process are you modelling? Btw you posted this in the Fluent forum, so I'm guessing fluid flow effects should be important.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo_Zeo View Post
or do you think it would be more interesting the use of Maxwell or Ansys Mechanical?
It would indeed be very interesting to see someone trying to model thermal radiation using Maxwell or Mechanical... because I'm not sure how you would model radiation at all.

Ansys mechanical is a structural package which has very little to do with light propagation or heat transfer. But if you're analyzing structural loads, then you don't need details of the radiation and heat transfer processes since the solids do not couple strongly to light propagation or fluid dynamics.

Maxwell solves E&M (Maxwell)relations, which is suitable for E&M fields, but not suitable for ray tracing. Fluent is really good at Ray Tracing and surface 2 surface radiation, it has some capabilities to do participating media, but it's not suitable for dealing with electromagnetic induction for example. By itself, Maxwell doesn't solve Navier-Stokes so you're very limited in the fluid flow problems you can model.
Neo_Zeo likes this.

Last edited by LuckyTran; March 14, 2017 at 11:19.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2017, 07:22
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10
Neo_Zeo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
Woah those are three very different modelling packages. What physical process are you modelling? Btw you posted this in the Fluent forum, so I'm guessing fluid flow effects should be important.

I need to study the best way to position a reflector to improve the light reflexion. I need to improve the light flux reflected from a determined geometry.



It would indeed be very interesting to see someone trying to model thermal radiation using Maxwell or Mechanical... because I'm not sure how you would model radiation at all.

Ansys mechanical is a structural package which has very little to do with light propagation or heat transfer. But if you're analyzing structural loads, then you don't need details of the radiation and heat transfer processes since the solids do not couple strongly to light propagation or fluid dynamics.

In Ansys Mechanical, in a thermal analysis I can study radiation:

https://confluence.cornell.edu/displ...erical+Results

But I really dont know the difference between this type of study in Fluent or Mechanical.


Maxwell solves E&M (Maxwell)relations, which is suitable for E&M fields, but not suitable for ray tracing. Fluent is really good at Ray Tracing and surface 2 surface radiation, it has some capabilities to do participating media, but it's suitable for dealing with electromagnetic induction for example. By itself, Maxwell doesn't solve Navier-Stokes so you're very limited in the fluid flow problems you can model.

You are right. I experimented with Maxwell, and it "just" works with magnetic and electrical phenomena. Not radiation.

Thank you very much for your help !
Neo_Zeo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2017, 11:27
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Fluent can certainly do the ray tracing or surface to surface radiation problem for you. But it still may be too complicated a tool. For starters, most of ray tracing and s2s radiation you can do by simple hand-calculations. There's not much benefit you can get out of Fluent except to do these for "complex problems."

In mechanical you don't study radiation, you simply model its effects on your solid. I.e. when I stand in the sun, the radiation heats my face and my face feels warm. Mechanical allows you to model this heating and warmness but it doesn't tell you how the radiation got there or the nature of the radiation. All it cares is that, hmms, there's some heat!

The Maxwell relations are the appropriate governing equations for radiation (E&M), but they are probably way too high order for your need as you don't really care about the distinction between electric and magnetic fields.
Neo_Zeo likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2017, 12:29
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10
Neo_Zeo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
Fluent can certainly do the ray tracing or surface to surface radiation problem for you. But it still may be too complicated a tool. For starters, most of ray tracing and s2s radiation you can do by simple hand-calculations. There's not much benefit you can get out of Fluent except to do these for "complex problems."

In mechanical you don't study radiation, you simply model its effects on your solid. I.e. when I stand in the sun, the radiation heats my face and my face feels warm. Mechanical allows you to model this heating and warmness but it doesn't tell you how the radiation got there or the nature of the radiation. All it cares is that, hmms, there's some heat!

The Maxwell relations are the appropriate governing equations for radiation (E&M), but they are probably way too high order for your need as you don't really care about the distinction between electric and magnetic fields.
Thank you very much again!

If finally my client accept the offer, I`ll tell you how did I perform the study.
Neo_Zeo is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to implement a sensitivity analysis for certain items Mason liu CFX 10 August 17, 2017 08:46
ANSYS WORKBENCH Transfer result of one analysis to a new analysis as preload ingjuanm90 ANSYS 0 July 26, 2016 14:04
Conditions to neglect the reflection of expansion/shock waves in fluent analysis Akhundzada91 FLUENT 0 November 23, 2014 12:40
Acoustic Analysis using Fluent and ANSYS mechanical ankit1512 ANSYS 0 November 10, 2013 18:46
Acoutic fan analysis arunraj FLUENT 0 October 4, 2012 05:54


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:11.