|
[Sponsors] |
Export Data Access Macross. Plot Second-Order Pressure. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 11, 2017, 15:46 |
Export Data Access Macross. Plot Second-Order Pressure.
|
#1 |
New Member
Brian
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello community! I'm new in Fluent and I want to know if what I'm trying to do is possible and if it is, how can I do it.
I need to plot the Interstitial Fluid Pressure for a solid tumor surrounded by interstitial fluid being subjected to focused ultrasound waves (both high intensity and low intensity). I have an UDF for first-order parameters defined like this: DEFINE_SOURCE(msource,c,t,dS,eqn) { real source; source = (CSV * (VFP - C_P(c, t) - SIG * (PIV-PIF))) - (CSL * (C_P(c, t) - ILP)); dSn[eqn] = 0.0; return source; } (One for tumor tissue and another for normal tissue). C_P(c, t) stands for the data access macros that accesses the pressure in a cell designated by the pointer c contained in the cell thread designated by the pointer t. The variables CSV, CSL, VFP, SIG, PIV, PIF, ILP are all constant-valued parameters that may take on different values over different cell-threads. I need to calculate the second-order pressure for this problem, which is a function of C_P(c, t) and the fluid velocity as follows <> = a *<> + b *<> Being a and b constants, the first-order fluid velocity and the second-order pressure. My attempt to solve this, due to my lack of experience with Fluent is import the calculated values of C_P(c, t) and then write another UDF for the second-order pressure as above and finally import that UDF to solve for . Also I want the instantaneous values of over stationary surfaces, not just the mean-valued terms. Is this possible? Is there another way to do something like this? I'm looking forward to your answers! Thank you very much for your time. My best regards! Brian. |
|
May 13, 2017, 12:35 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,672
Rep Power: 65 |
This could even be done with a custom-field-function instead of a UDF route, but custom-field-functions can't be run in parallel unless you have the latest v18.
Quote:
When you are in a steady solver x-velocity is the mean velocity. When you are in a transient solver x-velocity is the instantaneous velocity and the mean variables have a new name. |
||
May 13, 2017, 15:15 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Brian
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Thank you very much!
Do you know of any tutorial that explain how to do that? |
|
Tags |
data access macross, fluent, second-order pressure |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Periodic flow using Cyclic - comparison with Fluent | nusivares | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | December 12, 2017 05:35 |
Utility to export field data | tbrycekelly | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 0 | July 13, 2016 10:42 |
CFX Solver stopped with error when requested for backup during solver running | Mfaizan | CFX | 40 | May 13, 2016 06:50 |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 06:27 |
pressure gradient term in low speed flow | Atit Koonsrisuk | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 10, 2002 10:52 |