CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Non-zero mass flow rate for a confined region and bizarre vector field at wall

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 28, 2017, 01:02
Default Non-zero mass flow rate for a confined region and bizarre vector field at wall
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
appotoxin is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I am using Fluent17.1 to simulate the performance of a 2D water column and the results I get are very problematic. I will greatly appreciate it if you could kindly provide me with some suggestions.

The flow domain is rectangular(0.2m(horizontal)*3m(vertical)) and confined by four walls(left, right, top and bottom). The left wall is heated with a constant flux and the rest are adiabatic. The working fluid is water and Boussinesq approximation is used to include the buoyancy effect. The conjectured temperature change (<1 degree) should be low enough to keep the Boussinesq approximation valid. I ran the simulation in transient scheme and get some problematic results:

1. The confined domain has a non-zero mass flow rate, not even close to zero(somewhere around 0.05kg/s for the finest mesh I tried), while the mass flow rates across the boundaries are all zero. With CFL number kept constant (by changing time step accordingly with the mesh size), I used different meshes to run the same simulation and found that mesh refinement only made the results worse. I used both laminar and turbulence models to run the case and also tried to decrease the CFL number, but the problem persists.

2. The vector field near the top boundary shows some abnormal features. Since no-slip condition is applied to all the walls, I am expecting the velocities at the walls to be zeroish. However, in the vector plot, I got some vectors strangely pointing outside at the top boundary with abnormally large velocity magnitudes. There was no smooth transition between these vectors and their neighbours so I don't think it is the result of convection.

Could anyone give me some insight into the causes of these problems? Any help and advice will be greatly appreciated.

It is my first thread here and please let me know if you need any further information about my case. Thank you.

Regards,
appotoxin
appotoxin is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boussinesq approximation, fluent, natural convection

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18.