CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Single moving reference frame vs Multiple reference frame for Wind Turbine CFD

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 8, 2017, 11:40
Default Single moving reference frame vs Multiple reference frame for Wind Turbine CFD
  #1
Member
 
numan
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
mrswordf1sh is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,

I am analysing torque output from a horizontal axis wind turbine using CFD. There are two approach in the literature, one is using a single rotating frame of reference/fluid domain which is rotating at a constant speed and the other one using multiple frames (MRF) which consists of two frames whereas the outer frame is stationary and the frame around the wind turbine blades is rotating.

I tried both approaches and they give similar results. SRF takes much more time to converge than MRF. What is the difference between these two approaches for wind turbine blade simulations in FLUENT and in general?

Thank you.
mrswordf1sh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2017, 05:01
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0
CeesH is on a distinguished road
It's a symmetry consideration, mostly. For your wind turbine, consider the following 2 situations:

- the domain around the turbine is empty, and can be modeled as perfectly tangentially symmetric

- there is a building relatively close to the wind turbine on the east side, modifying the flow pattern significantly.


In the first situation, you can use single reference frame (assume the world rotates around your wind turbine) due to the symmetry. In the second case, however, this would imply the building is rotating around your wind turbine, which is clearly wrong! Hence, in the second case you need to use multiple reference frames to ensure that the position of the building compared to the turbine is fixed, while the air directly around it is implied to rotate.

For a horizontal turbine, MRF needs to be used also, because otherwise the ground would revolve around the turbine (and the shaft in case that is modeled).
CeesH is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2017, 10:28
Default
  #3
Member
 
numan
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
mrswordf1sh is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the response. I guess there will be no problem in using periodic boundary condition using MRF as well?.So, I will model one blade in a rotating domain and put it in a stationary domain (120 Degrees, circle). Define both as periodic (stationary and rotating). See attachment.

Thank you

Last edited by mrswordf1sh; August 17, 2017 at 10:25.
mrswordf1sh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2017, 13:25
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,215
Blog Entries: 19
Rep Power: 30
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
Actually, the point is that any zone where a rotating reference frame is used, either SRF or MRF, will have an additional source term in the equations. Using a SRF will use that source term in all the cells of the domain. Using a MRF, in this case, will require a source term only in a relatively small amount of cells. As that source term depends on the local velocity, it will necessarily affect the convergence and the more cells have it the worst it will be.

Obviously, this doesn't mean that you have to always apply MRF. It also comes with its own problems. More often than not, if SRF can be applied, you should go with it. But you can find additional details in the manual.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 25, 2020, 08:43
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Tanuj Srivastava
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3
S_Tanuj is on a distinguished road
If there is no interface in the domain, is it advisable to use mesh motion along with frame motion? Because if I am using only frame motion then there occurs no motion in animation. While using a frame with mesh motion ...or only mesh motion, there is the motion as I can see in animation. I find no relative literature which relates mesh or frame motion without interface.
S_Tanuj is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simulation of a single bubble with a VOF-method Suzzn CFX 21 January 29, 2018 00:58
Moving reference frame ? elephantome FLUENT 9 November 16, 2015 07:22
Error with Wmake skabilan OpenFOAM Installation 3 July 28, 2009 00:35
Multiple reference frame Lim FLUENT 1 April 19, 2008 10:46
Multiple reference frame in centrifugal fan Peter Main CFD Forum 0 April 8, 2008 05:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52.